2007
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving.

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to assess the differential effects of a single strategy (schema-based instruction; SBI) versus multiple strategies (general strategy instruction, GSI) in promoting mathematical problem solving and mathematics achievement as well as to examine the influence of word problem-solving instruction on the development of computational skills. Eighty-eight 3rd graders and their teachers were assigned randomly to conditions (SBI and GSI). Students were pre- and posttested on mathematical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
120
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
120
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional studies have not gone so far as to determine a strategic order to the effectiveness of visual representation strategies, but they have studied the value of schematic and pictorial representations (Hegarty & Kozhevnikov, 1999;Jitendra et al, 2007;van Garderen & Montague, 2003;van Garderen et al, 2012). A general consensus has emerged from this research that would agree with van Garderen's (2008) findings.…”
Section: The Value Of Pictorial and Schematic Representationssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional studies have not gone so far as to determine a strategic order to the effectiveness of visual representation strategies, but they have studied the value of schematic and pictorial representations (Hegarty & Kozhevnikov, 1999;Jitendra et al, 2007;van Garderen & Montague, 2003;van Garderen et al, 2012). A general consensus has emerged from this research that would agree with van Garderen's (2008) findings.…”
Section: The Value Of Pictorial and Schematic Representationssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Word problems become a primary focus because they help students analyze mathematical processes as well as different uses of arithmetic operations (Jitendra et al, 2007, p. 115). Jitendra et al (2007) suggest that successful word problem solving can lead to increased quality of computation skills in middle school students. The researchers also reference a breakdown of the skills students use when solving word problems (Jitendra et al, 2007, p. 115).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all of the articles reviewed in the present study, Jitendra et al (2007) did a good job in reporting and interpreting effect size. The purpose of their study was to investigate the differential effects of a single strategy (schema-based instruction [SBI]) versus multiple strategies (general strategy instruction [GSI]) in promoting mathematical problem solving.…”
Section: An Example Of Reporting and Interpreting Effect Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in the existing literature report that the schema approach is effective in teaching verbal mathematics problems to typically developing individuals (Griffin & Jitendra, 2009;Jitendra et al, 2009) as well as those with learning disabilities (Griffin & Jitendra, 2009;Jitendra, DiPipi, & Perron-Jones, 2002;Jitendra & Hoff, 1996;Jitendra, Hoff, & Beck,1999;Jitendra et al, 2007;Na, 2009;Xin, 2008;Xin, Jitendra, & Deatline-Buchman, 2005), emotional and behavioral disorders (Jitendra, George, Sood, & Price, 2010), visual impairment (Tuncer, 2009), and intellectual disorders (Baki, 2014;Jitendra et al, 1998;Karabulut, Yıkmış, Özak, & Karabulut, 2013;Kot, 2014). However, only a limited number of studies have been conducted with individuals with ASD (Rockwell, 2012;Rockwell, Griffin, & Jones, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A student who learns the process and correctly solves the problem related to this process during the process approach instruction could experience difficulties when encountering the same verbal problem with an unknown variance, instead of an unknown result (Engelbrecht, Bergsten, & Kagesten, 2009). The schema approach was developed to compensate for the disadvantages of the process approach (Bender, 2009, p. 111;Jitendra et al, 2007). Schemas used in the solution of verbal mathematics problems are achieved through the direct instruction method (Rockwell, 2012), which involves four steps: (a) creating a need, (b) setting an example, (c) guided applications, and (d) independent application steps (Aykut, 2012, pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%