1992
DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90011-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of spatial feature extraction algorithms for land-use classification with SPOT HRV data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
152
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
152
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of the 236 985 image pixels, expert photointerpreters labeled two spatially separated sets of pixels with their correct land-cover class. Due to their a priori information on the territorial variability, they focused on seven land-cover classes: vegetated land (class 1), built-up area (2), pine wood (3), urban green (4), greenhouses (5), not-vegetated land (6), and water (7). We asked the photointerpreter to find pixels mainly occupied by only one class in order to have a hard-labeled data set.…”
Section: A Data Set I Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of the 236 985 image pixels, expert photointerpreters labeled two spatially separated sets of pixels with their correct land-cover class. Due to their a priori information on the territorial variability, they focused on seven land-cover classes: vegetated land (class 1), built-up area (2), pine wood (3), urban green (4), greenhouses (5), not-vegetated land (6), and water (7). We asked the photointerpreter to find pixels mainly occupied by only one class in order to have a hard-labeled data set.…”
Section: A Data Set I Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study focuses on multiclass land-cover classification of multispectral and multisource remotely sensed images with different spatial resolutions: A high-resolution image registered by the IKONOS sensor (4 m/pixel) and a low-medium-resolution image registered by the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) sensor (15 m/pixel) have been used. To exploit the high-resolution images, we extracted some textural features using the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) [6], [7] and merged them with spectral information taken from the medium-resolution images. We compared the aforementioned classification methods, trained on hard-labeled data, and studied their performances in terms of overall accuracy on hardlabeled data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall accuracy was calculated for summary measures (Gong et al, 1992), which can be used to compare individual class difference between distinct classifications (Coburn and Roberts, 2004).…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Franklin and Peddle [7] raised the classification accuracy of SPOT HRV imagery from 51.1% (spectral alone) to 86.7% by adding the GLCM features created from one of the SPOT HRV bands into the spectral space. Gong et al [8] used the GLCM textures extracted from one of the SPOT XS bands, as well as the multispectral information, to improve land-use classification. Puissant et al [9] confirmed that the use of GLCM textures created from the panchromatic band was able to significantly improve the per-pixel classification accuracy for high-resolution images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%