A comparison of spoken and signed lingua franca communication: the case of English as a lingua franca (ELF) and International Sign (IS)

Abstract

This article explores similarities between English as a lingua franca (ELF) and International Sign (IS), two lingua franca phenomena which in the last decades have been subject to increasing, albeit independent, linguistic research. In contrast to spoken intercultural communication, in which English often represents a shared resource that speakers from different linguacultural backgrounds draw on, in the visual-gestural modality no specific sign language has yet gained such global reach. Instead, in many international contexts IS is used: a lingua franca that can be more or less conventionalized and that is not based on one particular sign language. IS use depends on the communicative situation, in which signers flexibly and creatively use different signs from natural sign languages as well as iconic elements and gestures. Despite overt formal differences between ELF and IS, when focusing on the actual communication process, rather than the forms that result from it, the two lingua franca phenomena share many similarities. In fact, both ELF and IS are variable communicative means that get situationally adapted by speakers and signers on the basis of different resources they have at their disposal. Similar discussions about the difficulty of conceptualizing ELF and IS, about the role of multilingual resources, and about interaction processes at play can thus be found in both ELF and IS literature. This insight opens up new possibilities for researchers in the two fields to mutually benefit from the study of lingua franca communication in the other modality, which prompts the need for a cross-modal collaboration between ELF and IS researchers.

Modality Realization in Covid-19 Academic Papers

“…The type of probability with the most occurrences is shown in the table. It expresses information from the writer's articles that could happen in the past or in the future (Bierbaumer, 2021;Parina & De Leon, 2014). When it comes to probability, the writers have employed it when they want to.…”

“…They are as follows: finite modal operator, modal adjunct, expansion o predicator, and combination of finite modal operator and modal adjunct (Justice et al, 2018;Parina & De Leon, 2014). Other study classified modality into two types: modalization and modulation (Bierbaumer, 2021;Ha, 2021). Each of the two categories is further subdivided into two subtypes.…”

Code Mixing in Boy William’s Vlog “Kediaman Raja Film Indonesia”

“…In every region of the world, people developed their own language, their own way to interact between their communities. In this Globalization era, multilingual society is not uncommon, sometimes people from multilingual society mix the language code in their communication process (Bierbaumer, 2021;Brick et al, 2019;Okal, 2014). Language is an object of study in sociolinguistics.…”