2021
DOI: 10.1002/met.1976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of statistical and dynamical downscaling methods for short‐term weather forecasts in the US Northeast

Abstract: The Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) was used to produce both 9 and 3 km resolution ensemble forecasts from the deterministic Global Forecast System (GFS) model for microclimatic, agricultural regions in New York State. The forecasts were then statistically post‐processed to generate probabilistic forecasts for surface temperature (T), specific humidity (q), incoming solar radiation (SR) and precipitation (P). T was post‐processed with non‐homogeneous Gaussian regression (NGR), q and SR with trunca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, reanalysis data frequently fail to simulate many of the processes that drive regional and local climate variability. Their limitations lie in their incapability of accurately depicting sub-km-scale climate variables at the needed timescales and do not allow for proper representations of the local topography and sub-grid-scale features that are essential in areas with complex terrain, microclimates or narrow mountain valleys, as highlighted by Holden et al [19], Zhang et al [20], Le Roux et al [21], Alessi and DeGaetano [22], and Zhang et al [23]. When evaluated in contrast to observational data, the raw output data are regularly found to have systematic biases [24,25], limiting their usefulness for local applications [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, reanalysis data frequently fail to simulate many of the processes that drive regional and local climate variability. Their limitations lie in their incapability of accurately depicting sub-km-scale climate variables at the needed timescales and do not allow for proper representations of the local topography and sub-grid-scale features that are essential in areas with complex terrain, microclimates or narrow mountain valleys, as highlighted by Holden et al [19], Zhang et al [20], Le Roux et al [21], Alessi and DeGaetano [22], and Zhang et al [23]. When evaluated in contrast to observational data, the raw output data are regularly found to have systematic biases [24,25], limiting their usefulness for local applications [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, due to their coarse spatial resolution, mostly lower than 1 km (Caldwell et al., 2009; Yan et al., 2020), NWP models have mainly been applied to develop climate change scenarios and perform large‐scale studies. These models suffer in their ability to resolve fine‐scale air temperature (sub‐km scale) at the timescales relevant to biota living in narrow mountain valleys (e.g., 10–30 m; Holden et al., 2011), in microclimates or in areas of complex terrain (Alessi & DeGaetano, 2021; Le Roux et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%