2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of strategic mine planning approaches for in-pit crushing and conveying, and truck/shovel systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Best application for fixed crusher systems is in deep, pre-existing pits with a low vertical advance rate. The crusher must be able to handle the operation without being relocated over a time longer than five years [3]. Fully-mobile in-pit crushing stations are best applied in greenfield operations [3].…”
Section: Crusher Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best application for fixed crusher systems is in deep, pre-existing pits with a low vertical advance rate. The crusher must be able to handle the operation without being relocated over a time longer than five years [3]. Fully-mobile in-pit crushing stations are best applied in greenfield operations [3].…”
Section: Crusher Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SMIPCC can exploit the advantages of both systems, conventional trucking and fully mobile IPCC, but it is important to ensure that the in-pit crusher is at an appropriate distance from the work front and that its location will be suitable for at least one year of operation before it needs to be moved (Rahmanpour et al 2014). SMIPCC systems are considered flexible and adaptable because of the continuous use of trucks and being able to install a crusher in a suitable location (Nehring et al 2018). In the majority of studies that compare IPCC with truck based haulage systems using conveyors, results in large operational savings due to a more efficient energy and capital allocation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The truck fleet size is determined by evaluating the model that is based on the mine's production capacity and operating parameters, specifically, the average haulage distance (AHD). These two factors are very important as they hold great weight in the decision to use the IPCC system (NEHRING et al 2018). By selecting the truck size (model) from one of the four options, the number of trucks is calculated, as well as the number of bulldozers and motor graders required (Figure 7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMIPCC systems are considered flexible and adaptable because of the continuous use of trucks and being able to install a crusher in a suitable location (NEHRING et al 2018). The majority of studies that compare IPCC with truck based haulage systems using conveyors, result in large operational savings due to a more efficient energy and capital allocation.…”
Section: Onementioning
confidence: 99%