2013
DOI: 10.1080/08841233.2013.828668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Student Knowledge and Attitude toward Research: Are Main Campus Students Different from Those in a Hybrid Environment?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using standardized measures of attitudes toward computers and technology use at the beginning and end of a research methods class with two sections (one online, the other face-to-face), they found no significant difference in the computer attitude scale between pretest and posttest and marginal differences in technology use between the two groups, with online students reporting greater comfort using technology than their face-to-face counterparts. Buchanan and Mathews (2013) used the Kirk-Rosenblatt Research Inventory (1981) to assess MSW social work students' beliefs, knowledge, and opinions about research, finding no statistically significant difference between main campus and satellite MSW students' knowledge. Cummings et al (2015) used a standardized measure of self-efficacy to explore differences between online and face-to-face students from the perspective of an overall program, finding no significant difference between online and face-to-face student outcomes (Cummings et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using standardized measures of attitudes toward computers and technology use at the beginning and end of a research methods class with two sections (one online, the other face-to-face), they found no significant difference in the computer attitude scale between pretest and posttest and marginal differences in technology use between the two groups, with online students reporting greater comfort using technology than their face-to-face counterparts. Buchanan and Mathews (2013) used the Kirk-Rosenblatt Research Inventory (1981) to assess MSW social work students' beliefs, knowledge, and opinions about research, finding no statistically significant difference between main campus and satellite MSW students' knowledge. Cummings et al (2015) used a standardized measure of self-efficacy to explore differences between online and face-to-face students from the perspective of an overall program, finding no significant difference between online and face-to-face student outcomes (Cummings et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applicability of using an online environment to deliver social work education continues to be questioned (Buchanan & Mathews, 2013), with particular emphasis on the online teaching of practice courses (Ferrera et al, 2013;Forgey & Ortega-Williams, 2016). Some argue that the proliferation of online learning has deteriorated the culture of intellectual thought usually facilitated through traditional classroom settings (Brabazon, 2002).…”
Section: Blended Learning Curriculum In Social Work Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning policies at schools and universities must be clarified in terms of efforts of preventing Covid-19 transmission. Hybrid learning, online and offline, can be carried out at schools and universities (Barak & Dori, 2009;Buchanan & Mathews, 2013). Health education with hybrid learning has several advantages, among others, students can still receive content directly from the lecturers while complying with applicable health protocols; hence, hybrid learning is the right solution at the moment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%