A comparison of success and time consumption of the most common methods for detection of the SSVEP

Šmondrk, Maroš; Vozda, M.; Krohová, Jana; Hrvolová, Barbora; Peterek, Tomáš; Penhaker, Marek

doi:10.1109/tsp.2013.6614018

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several methods were proposed for SSVEP detection such as power spectral density analysis (PSDA), time domain analysis, Hilbert Huang transform (HHT), autoregressive model (AR model), Wavelet transform and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) [5]- [9]. Both CCA and PSDA are the most widely used frequency detection method in SSVEP-based BCIs and have better performance on SSVEP detection [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Improving classification accuracy of SSVEP based BCI using RBF SVM with signal quality evaluation

Jian

Tang

2014

2014 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ISPACS)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Power spectral density analysis (PSDA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) are two of the most widely used feature extraction methods for SSVEP based brain computer interfaces. However, these features may be contaminated by spontaneous EEG or noise. It is still a challenge to detect it with a high accuracy, especially at a short time window (TW) which is a tradeoff between accuracy and speed for brain computer interface. In this paper, we propose to combine both power spectral density analysis (PSDA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) for steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) feature extraction. One against one radial basis function support vector machine (OAO RBF SVM) is applied to classification in order to improve the short time window classification accuracy. Moreover, we present a signal quality evaluation method that cancels the decision of the RBF SVM when signal quality is low and prone to be misclassified. Making no decision could reduce the cost of making a wrong decision. Results show that our proposed method outperforms the standard CCA method in classifying SSVEP responses of five frequencies across four subjects. Approximately above 80 % SSVEP classification accuracy is achieved when time window is above three seconds.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Both CCA and PSDA are the most widely used frequency detection method in SSVEP-based BCIs and have better performance on SSVEP detection [9]. [10] and [11] reported that CCA method outperforms the PSDA.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%