1962
DOI: 10.1086/460027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Superior Achievers and Underachievers in Arithmetic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shaw and McCuen (1960) found a significant difference in grade-point average between eventual male achievers and overachievers beginning at the third-grade level. However, at least one study (Capps, 1964) found no sex differences in either the over-or underachieving group. A comparison of the female achievers and overachievers presented quite a different picture from that seen for the male groups.…”
Section: Results Of Research On Over-and Underachievementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Shaw and McCuen (1960) found a significant difference in grade-point average between eventual male achievers and overachievers beginning at the third-grade level. However, at least one study (Capps, 1964) found no sex differences in either the over-or underachieving group. A comparison of the female achievers and overachievers presented quite a different picture from that seen for the male groups.…”
Section: Results Of Research On Over-and Underachievementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As has been found in other studies of underachievement, there is a great deal of difference between what is found to be true of males and what seems to be true in the case of females. However, at least one study (Capps, 1964) found no sex differences in either the over-or underachieving group. Girls were reported, however, as having higher adjustment scores, and a reciprocal relationship was hypothesized between arithmetic retardation and personality adjustment.…”
Section: Over-and Underachievementmentioning
confidence: 97%