2019
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/501/1/012006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Temperature for Parabola and Sinusoidal Greenhouse Solar Dryer by CFD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this specific case the standard kmodel was used, which is composed of an equation for dissipation rate (Equation ( 5)) and another equation for turbulent kinetic energy (Equation ( 6)) [23,24]. This model of turbulence has been successfully used in similar works to the one developed in this research [25].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this specific case the standard kmodel was used, which is composed of an equation for dissipation rate (Equation ( 5)) and another equation for turbulent kinetic energy (Equation ( 6)) [23,24]. This model of turbulence has been successfully used in similar works to the one developed in this research [25].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion [51] showed that the Arc shape had the lowest consumption from a heating point of view. [52] while using CFD studied the thermal efficiency of two shapes; parabola and sinusoidal. The study used both shapes of length 8.2 m and wide 6.0 m, with the surface area being the only variation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%