2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aip.2021.101760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the diagnostic power of FEATS and Bender-Gestalt test in identifying the problems of students with and without specific learning disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected participants' age range was 4 up to 12 years old, because according to clinical practice and the suggestion of neurology and rehabilitation specialists, participants within this age range show significant motor performance progress in short rehabilitation time. Cognitively, participants had an average visuomotor age of 5.22 ± 2.44 years (Bender Koppitz Test [24]) to follow up the given assessment protocol. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) [25], levels I and II, and the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) [25], levels I and II, were also considered participant selection criteria in this study.…”
Section: B Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selected participants' age range was 4 up to 12 years old, because according to clinical practice and the suggestion of neurology and rehabilitation specialists, participants within this age range show significant motor performance progress in short rehabilitation time. Cognitively, participants had an average visuomotor age of 5.22 ± 2.44 years (Bender Koppitz Test [24]) to follow up the given assessment protocol. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) [25], levels I and II, and the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) [25], levels I and II, were also considered participant selection criteria in this study.…”
Section: B Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preventive procedures and recommendations were carefully followed to avoid COVID-19 spread among the study participants, such as sanitizer and antibacterial gel application, temperature checking, and keeping healthy distance. In order to determine if the participants were able to follow the required indications in the NUI assessment process, and be included in the study, each participant's cognitive level was evaluated by a psychologist through the Bender Kopitz Visuomotor Scale test [24] in second stage (S2). According to the psychologist's suggestion, participants with mental age deficits capable to follow indications were included in the study.…”
Section: Measurement Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the specific case of the visual arts modality (drawing, illustration, painting, collage, photography and sculpture), art therapy not only prevails as a clinical intervention tool (Cheng et al, 2021;Hass-Cohen et al, 2021;Tang et al, 2021) but also as a diagnostic tool (Akhavan Tafti et al, 2021;Goldner et al, 2021;Grenimann Bauch and Bat Or, 2021), which gives it a versatile and innovative character, and which distinguishes it from the other art therapy modalities. Bearing in mind the above, and given the variety of studies and publications in this regard, it is of interest to have a more in-depth view of the scope and characteristics of the existing research; bibliometrics is the ideal instrument for this objective since by using bibliometric indicators, it is possible to evaluate scientific activity in any discipline or area of knowledge, and thus determine different basic categories that define who the producing people, institutions or countries are, how much they produce, what the impact of their publications is and how they collaborate with each other (Rodríguez Gutiérrez and Gómez Velasco, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%