1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80363-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
98
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
8
98
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with previous clinical findings [5,8,12]. The results also correspond very well with the results of Steiner et al [16] on human cadavers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This is in agreement with previous clinical findings [5,8,12]. The results also correspond very well with the results of Steiner et al [16] on human cadavers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…As the initial results in comparison to PTB-SB reconstructions were inferior [8], further analyses proved a need to evaluate the type of graft fixation, to be able to compare those two different techniques more appropriately [21]. After introduction of new fixation devices in hamstring techniques, the clinical results of the STG-DB technique improved in terms of subjective and objective measurements [22] and therefore, some surgeons prefer the STG-DB technique because less anterior knee pain and a higher rotational stability can be achieved [5,7,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…On the other hand, these theoretical advantages may be obscured by the added complexity of the surgical procedure [4]. Various studies have compared the outcome of semitendinosus gracilis single bundle (STG-SB) with semitendinosus gracilis double bundle (STG-DB) or bone-patella tendon-bone single bundle (PTB-SB) ACL reconstructions in mid-term follow-up [5][6][7][8], but up until now, few papers have analysed the comparative outcome between PTB-SB and STG-DB ACL reconstruction [3]. Our manuscript contributes to further understanding of this comparative setting and verification of previous investigations in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid these problems the semitendinosus tendon, combined with that of gracilis (STG), has been used as an alternative procedure. Several comparative studies of ACL reconstruction using BTB and STG have been reported [1,4,5,7,13,18]. Marder et al [13] did not find any significant difference between the two methods in a prospective randomised study of 80 consecutive patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%