1997
DOI: 10.1177/039139889702000404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Dual Lumen and Coaxial Catheters for Temporary Hemodialysis Access

Abstract: Percutaneous central venous catheterization can provide reliable temporary hemodialysis access. The current study compared the hemodynamic performance of 28 coaxial catheters to 27 side by side catheters. A total of 675 dialysis sessions were evaluated to assess the flow characteristics of these two designs. The results demonstrated that the side by side catheter provided greater cumulative blood flow with more favorable venous and arterial pressures. Nevertheless, the coaxial catheter performed satisfactorily… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean blood flow over the life of the catheters was calculated as the mean of all eligible dialysis treatments. Blood flow was modeled using mixed models to account for repeated measures, calculate trends over time, and adjusted for any differences among the groups (5,6). Blood flow between catheters was compared using unpaired t-tests and by including catheter type as an independent variable in the mixed model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean blood flow over the life of the catheters was calculated as the mean of all eligible dialysis treatments. Blood flow was modeled using mixed models to account for repeated measures, calculate trends over time, and adjusted for any differences among the groups (5,6). Blood flow between catheters was compared using unpaired t-tests and by including catheter type as an independent variable in the mixed model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of temporary catheters report mean blood flows in the range of 250-300 mi/mm with recirculation less than 5% in neck catheters but increasing up to 22% in short femoral catheters (4,5). Walters and colleagues in a non-randomized study report average blood flows of 254-264 ml/min (6). Hirsh and colleagues did not report blood flows but were able to achieve a urea reduction ratio of 64.2% using temporary catheters for long term access in ambulatory patients (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous prospective studies of acute dialysis catheters report mean blood flow rates of 254–298 cc/min with recirculation ranging 3–10% (15,16). Recirculation increases to 18% in short femoral catheters (15 cm) at blood flow rates of 250‐ml/min (17).…”
Section: Acute Dialysis Catheter Malfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Walters et a]. (17), in a study of nontunneled, temporary catheters, required UK lock treatment in up to 9% of hernodialysis sessions. In some reports of the use of thrombolytic therapy to treat catheter clot, neither the drug used nor the method of administration is specified Catheter Lock Technique.…”
Section: Thrombolytic Therapymentioning
confidence: 97%