1999
DOI: 10.1076/ceyr.18.3.177.5370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the early inflammatory effects of an agr-/sar- versus a wild type strain of Staphylococcus aureus in a rat model of endophthalmitis

Abstract: Both strains of S. aureus induced clinical signs of inflammation and inflammatory cell infiltration. Clinical inflammation and inflammatory cell numbers were less in rats injected with the Mutant I strain. These results suggest that hemolysins and lipase may be important in the early induction phase of the inflammatory response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Cheung et al were unable to demonstrate significantly attenuated virulence for an agr mutant in a rabbit model of endocarditis, although a sar agr double mutant was diminished in both infectivity and intravegetation bacterial densities (2). Additional studies have found that although agr mutants are somewhat attenuated in virulence, they remain clearly capable of causing infection in a rabbit model of osteomyelitis (8) and a rat model of endophthalmitis (7). These studies, combined with the data presented here, suggest a much more complicated picture of staphylococcal virulence than that modeled with agr as a global regulator of virulence factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Cheung et al were unable to demonstrate significantly attenuated virulence for an agr mutant in a rabbit model of endocarditis, although a sar agr double mutant was diminished in both infectivity and intravegetation bacterial densities (2). Additional studies have found that although agr mutants are somewhat attenuated in virulence, they remain clearly capable of causing infection in a rabbit model of osteomyelitis (8) and a rat model of endophthalmitis (7). These studies, combined with the data presented here, suggest a much more complicated picture of staphylococcal virulence than that modeled with agr as a global regulator of virulence factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global regulators agr and sar, which control the density-dependent production of S. aureus adhesins and toxins, are critical for the intraocular virulence of S. aureus. Infections in eyes inoculated with strains deficient in agr, sar, or both global regulators were highly attenuated (Booth, et al, 1995(Booth, et al, ,1997Giese, et al, 1999), more so than that observed during infection with staphylococcal strains deficient individual toxins.…”
Section: Staphylococcusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence concerning the contribution of bacterial toxins to endophthalmitis demonstrates that in some cases, single toxins are the primary virulence factors (e.g., the Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin [21]). In other cases, multiple toxins work synergistically to achieve virulence (e.g., S. aureus toxins governed by the agr-sar quorum-sensing system [6,16]). In a manner similar to S. aureus virulence factor regulation, production of a number of Bacillus toxins is controlled by the transcriptional regulator plcR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%