1998
DOI: 10.1080/02678379808256871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the effect of job demand, dicision latitude, role and supervisory style on self-reported job satisfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This contradicts previous research reporting that large organizations create more stress for employees, however, this finding may not be applicable to hospital entities (Hall, 1992). As well, other researchers have reported that organizational size was not related to job stress (Greer & Castro, 1986;Hashemi, 1983;Lobban, Husted, & Farewell, 1998).…”
Section: Administration In Social Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This contradicts previous research reporting that large organizations create more stress for employees, however, this finding may not be applicable to hospital entities (Hall, 1992). As well, other researchers have reported that organizational size was not related to job stress (Greer & Castro, 1986;Hashemi, 1983;Lobban, Husted, & Farewell, 1998).…”
Section: Administration In Social Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Such clarity is not always apparent on entry to an organization or during early adjustment (van Sell et al, 1981), particularly when the entrant is unsure of managerial or supervisory expectations (Olk & Friedlander, 1992). Entry stressors such as role ambiguity have been associated with job dissatisfaction (Lobban et al, 1998;O'Driscoll & Beehr, 2000;Saks & Ashforth, 2000;Schaubroeck, Cotton, & Jennings, 1989) and distress (Barling & MacIntyre, 1993;O'Driscoll & Beehr, 2000). Entry stressors may be influenced directly by the support received in the workplace (Decker & Barling, 1995;Lee & Ashforth, 1993) and the control perceived (O'Driscoll & Beehr, 2000).…”
Section: Work Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Managerial support is perhaps the most important source of support in the work environment and has been noted to have a range of direct, indirect and moderational effects on role stress and emotional strain outcomes (Moyle, 1998). Direct effects of managerial support are reported on emotional distress (Holahan & Moos, 1981;Peeters & le Blanc, 2001), job satisfaction (Lobban, Husted, & Farewell, 1998), role ambiguity and clarity (Decker & Barling, 1995;Schmeider & Smith, 1996), job characteristics such as demands (Borg, Kristensen, & Burr, 2000) and control (van Sell, Brief, & Schuler, 1981), somatic health (Schmeider & Smith, 1996) and absenteeism (Eastburg, Williamson, Gorsuch, & Ridley, 1994). Other indirect or mediational effects are also seen.…”
Section: Work Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In die literatuur is die volgende organisatoriese stressors geïdentifiseer: onvoldoende administratiewe steun (Fontana, 1994) lang ure (Sparks, Cooper, Fried & Shiron (1997) swak salaris (Kum, Kervin, Clarke, Reid & Seirola, 1998) "red tape" en prosedures (Fontana, 1994) onsekerheid en onveiligheid (Fontana, 1994) tipe organisasie (Melin, Lundberg, Soderland en Granqvist, 1999) Wat werksverwante stressors betref, is die volgende in die literatuur gevind: rolkonflik, roldubbelsinnigheid en rolverwarring (Hammer, Allen & Grigsby, 1997) oorlading, onderlading (Steward & Balling, 1996) onrealistiese eise (Pentti & Uutela, 1996) min insae in besluitneming (Steward & Balling, 1996) toesighouers (Lobban, Husted & Farewell, 1998) kollegas (Burke, Greengloss & Konarski, 1997) min verskeidenheid (Fontana, 1994) swak kommunikasie (Fontana, 1994) swak leierskap (Fontana, 1994) tegnologie (Rice, 1992) interpersoonlike konflik (Narayanan et al, 1999) Die taakverwante stressors is soos volg: verantwoordelikheid (Statt, 1994) interaksie tussen kliënte en ondergeskiktes (Fontana, 1994) onduidelike take (Hackman, Hoffman, Moos, Osipow & Tornatzky, 1986) Navorsing het egter ook getoon dat sekere persoonlikheidstrekke 'n groter predisposisie ten opsigte van die negatiewe effekte van stres het. Die tipe A-persoonlikheid word gedefinieer as 'n aantal korrelerende gedragspatrone wat ongeduld, noodsaaklikheid van tyd, kompetisie en strewe na prestasie tot gevolg het (Lussier, 1993).…”
Section: Stresunclassified