1994
DOI: 10.1038/eye.1994.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the efficacy of Holmium laser sclerostomy ab externo versus trabeculectomy in the treatment of glaucoma

Abstract: We compared 15 patients who had undergone Holmium laser sclerostomy ab externo with 15 who had had trabeculectomy. In the short term, laser sclerostomy led to adequate control of intraocular pressure, but in the longer term it compared unfavourably with trabeculectomy in terms of efficacy, complications and reoperation rate. At 1 year follow-up, 8 patients in the laser group had had to undergo a second operation compared with none in the control trabeculectomy group, and 7 were still on glaucoma medication com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1995
1995
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in previous reports, there seems to be no clinical difference in the success rate of sclerostomies performed on eyes treated with 5-FU [3,8] and those without 5-FU [6,7]. Since the patient selection process and success criteria are different in these previous studies, the results cannot be compared.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, in previous reports, there seems to be no clinical difference in the success rate of sclerostomies performed on eyes treated with 5-FU [3,8] and those without 5-FU [6,7]. Since the patient selection process and success criteria are different in these previous studies, the results cannot be compared.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…In this respect, subconjunctival thermal sclerostomy with the holmium YAG (chromium-sensitized thulium and holmium-doped) laser can create a full-thickness filtering fistula without the need for a large conjunctival incision or intraocular manipulation. Although recent clinical reports have confirmed the safety and efficacy on this method for use in glaucoma filtration surgery [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], several problems remain. The procedure has a relatively lower success rate than that obtained using conventional trabeculectomy and has specific complications, such as iris incarceration at the sclerostomy site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation