2013
DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2013.849680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the governing of primary and secondary schools in England

Abstract: In England, governing bodies continue to be responsible for the conduct of publicly funded schools. This article compares the governing of publicly funded primary schools (for 5-11 year olds) and secondary schools (for 11-18 year olds). The research analysed policy documents and the governing of 16 primary and 14 secondary schools. The main governance mode for both primary schools and secondary schools is hierarchical and similar in nature, and the governing bodies of primary and secondary schools use broadly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, MATs may comprise different school types: primary; secondary; post-sixteen; and special or alternative provision (Greany and Higham, 2018;Simon et al, 2019). This issue is significant for governing practice in such diverse MATs, particularly as the governing of primary and secondary schools has been shown to be different (James et al, 2010;James, et al, 2014). Nonetheless, it was made clear in 2015 that the guidance on effective governance applied to all schools regardless of their status and the way they are funded (DfE, 2015).…”
Section: Schools In Englandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, MATs may comprise different school types: primary; secondary; post-sixteen; and special or alternative provision (Greany and Higham, 2018;Simon et al, 2019). This issue is significant for governing practice in such diverse MATs, particularly as the governing of primary and secondary schools has been shown to be different (James et al, 2010;James, et al, 2014). Nonetheless, it was made clear in 2015 that the guidance on effective governance applied to all schools regardless of their status and the way they are funded (DfE, 2015).…”
Section: Schools In Englandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These barriers may also be intensified in schools that find it difficult to get parents to serve as governors (see, for example, Ranson et al, 2005; Xaba & Nhlapo, 2014). In England, for example, James et al (2014) point out that recruiting post-primary school parent governors can be somewhat more difficult than in primary schools and suggest that it could be especially difficult in disadvantaged settings. This also appears to be the case in Ireland, where although board members can fill a variety of duties, there are also issues surrounding the capability of schools to form a board that has the capacity to carry out all the required duties of school boards.…”
Section: Resistance Objections and Drawbacks To Parent And Student Vo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of awareness might be because the boards of most academies are appointed (Honingh, Ruiter, & Thiel, 2018) rather than elected, meaning parents can be excluded from school decisionmaking, or because the governance of schools shift from being shared and decentralised to increasingly centralised and brokered by central staff as MATs grow (Ehren & Godfrey, 2017). Furthermore, it might also be because it can be more difficult to recruit secondary school parent governors than in primary schools, and especially in disadvantaged settings (James et al, 2014). Nonetheless, while the participants were unsure of the level of formal involvement parents had in academies, conversations did turn towards the platform that was given to parents to share their viewpoints:…”
Section: More Involvement For Parentsmentioning
confidence: 99%