A comparison of the impact of hospital reform on medical subcultures in some Australian and New Zealand hospitals

Abstract

This article examines similarities and differences in the way that hospital staff in Australia and New Zealand are evaluating efforts to improve quality, clinical effectiveness and service integration, and to strengthen clinical accountability. We draw on data from a cross-national study of hospital staff in Australia and New Zealand. The results highlight the way in which respondents' views about reform are influenced by the interplay of two factors: the impact of respondents' occupational backgrounds (our findings point to differences in the profession-based subcultures of medicine, nursing and general management and the way that these are reflected in respondents' assessments of particular aspects of reform); and the way that the impact of professional subcultures may be mitigated by differences between the systems in which respondents were located, including differences between the programs of reform that have been pursued in each country. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Medicine, management, and modernisation: a "danse macabre"?

“…Evidence about how healthcare professionals view these issues was obtained from a survey of 3065 medical clinicians, medical managers, general managers, nurse managers, and nurse clinicians working in 26 hospitals in England, Wales, Australia, and New Zealand 13 – 16. The survey asked questions about health professionals' attitudes towards:…”

Doctors and managers: poor relationships may be damaging patients--what can be done?

“…Their work also starts to shed light on why relationships with managers can be difficult. Doctors, managers, and nurses differ in their views on five key dimensions: [15][16][17] N Accountability v autonomy: whether they ascribe to accountability to others or personal autonomy. N Power: doctors tend to reject the idea that the power sharing implied by team working is appropriate, nurses and managers tend to be more positive.…”

Interdisciplinary practice – a matter of teamwork: an integrated literature review

“…Collaboration between health professionals is increasingly popular in organizations that are managed under the corporate governance model (Perkins et al. , 2000) that demands clinical accountability (Degeling et al ., 1999) and integrated care (Davies, 1999). While some health service providers have embraced the team‐based organization in efforts to create new modes of service delivery for the modern‐day context (Manion et al ., 1996), there is little empirical evidence to suggest that interdisciplinary teams improve patient outcomes (Zwarenstein & Reeves, 2000).…”