2023
DOI: 10.1039/d3ya00336a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the impact of cation chemistry in ionic liquid-based lithium battery electrolytes

Faezeh Makhlooghiazad,
Colin S. M. Kang,
Mojtaba Eftekharnia
et al.

Abstract: There is an increasing interest in ionic liquid electrolytes for battery applications because they are potentially safer alternatives to conventional liquid electrolytes. As the properties of ionic liquid electrolytes strongly...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self‐diffusion measurements for 1 H, 19 F, and 7 Li were performed at 50, 70, and 90 °C using a pulsed field gradient stimulated echo NMR pulse sequence with a Bruker Advance III 7.05 T spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm Bruker Diff50 probe with a maximum strength of 3000 G cm −1 . The gradient pulse length was 2 ms and the diffusion time was 20 ms. To extract the diffusion coefficients, the data were fitted in the Bruker Topspin software using the Stejskal–Tanner Equation (5): [ 60 ] I0.33embadbreak=I00.33em.exp()badbreak−normalDγ2g2δ2()normalΔδ3$$\begin{equation}I\ = {{I}_0}\ \rm .exp\left( { - D{{\gamma }^2}{{g}^2}{{\delta }^2}\left( {\Delta - \frac{\delta }{3}} \right)} \right)\end{equation}$$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self‐diffusion measurements for 1 H, 19 F, and 7 Li were performed at 50, 70, and 90 °C using a pulsed field gradient stimulated echo NMR pulse sequence with a Bruker Advance III 7.05 T spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm Bruker Diff50 probe with a maximum strength of 3000 G cm −1 . The gradient pulse length was 2 ms and the diffusion time was 20 ms. To extract the diffusion coefficients, the data were fitted in the Bruker Topspin software using the Stejskal–Tanner Equation (5): [ 60 ] I0.33embadbreak=I00.33em.exp()badbreak−normalDγ2g2δ2()normalΔδ3$$\begin{equation}I\ = {{I}_0}\ \rm .exp\left( { - D{{\gamma }^2}{{g}^2}{{\delta }^2}\left( {\Delta - \frac{\delta }{3}} \right)} \right)\end{equation}$$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%