2013
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/ent051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Letter-Processing Skills of Hearing and Deaf Readers: Evidence From Five Orthographies

Abstract: This study was designed to examine the letter-processing skills of prelingually deaf and hearing students recruited from five different orthographic backgrounds (Hebrew, Arabic, English, German, and Turkish). Participants were 128 hearing and 133 deaf 6th-7th graders. They were tested with a same/different paradigm that assessed their ability to process letters under perceptual and conceptual conditions. Findings suggest that the letter-processing skills of deaf readers from some orthographic backgrounds may b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Share (e.g., 2008Share (e.g., , 2021 has written on English as an "outlier" orthography and contested the Anglocentricities of reading research, which could constrain theoretical understandings about reading process and acquisition and practically impair linguistically responsive strategies of instruction for diverse readers. In this respect, the few studies such as Guldenoglu et al (2014) and Miller et al (2012), MOPRHOLOGY AND READING IN DHH STUDENTS 34 which compared letter or lexical processing in different languages and orthographies in DHH populations, are particularly noteworthy. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, little if any has been done on morphological processing and reading with a specific focus on DHH students.…”
Section: Limitations Of Meta-analysis Gaps In the Primary Literature ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Share (e.g., 2008Share (e.g., , 2021 has written on English as an "outlier" orthography and contested the Anglocentricities of reading research, which could constrain theoretical understandings about reading process and acquisition and practically impair linguistically responsive strategies of instruction for diverse readers. In this respect, the few studies such as Guldenoglu et al (2014) and Miller et al (2012), MOPRHOLOGY AND READING IN DHH STUDENTS 34 which compared letter or lexical processing in different languages and orthographies in DHH populations, are particularly noteworthy. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, little if any has been done on morphological processing and reading with a specific focus on DHH students.…”
Section: Limitations Of Meta-analysis Gaps In the Primary Literature ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A siket gyermekek nyelvelsajátítási folyamatainak feltérképezéséről már számos nemzetközi munka látott napvilágot (pl. Kyle 1994;Newport-Supalla 1999;Singleton-Newport 2004;Mayberry-Squires 2006;Kyle-Harris 2010;Mayberry et al 2011;Guldenoglu et al 2013;Swanwick 2016), míg hazai körben Hattyár Helga (2008) folytatott empirikus vizsgálatokat a nyelvelsajátítási módok és a nyelvhasználati mintázatok összefüggéseinek feltárásával kapcsolatban. Ezen alapos és minden lényegi területet érintő munkára alapozva e dolgozatban csak a vizsgálatomhoz kapcsolódó szükséges és releváns információk összefoglalására szorítkozom.…”
Section: A Siket Gyermekek Nyelvelsajátítási Mintázatai/folyamatai éS...unclassified