2020
DOI: 10.1134/s1061934820130146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Limits of Detection for a Number of Surrogates of Organophosphorus Toxic Agents and Methylphosphonic Acid Silyl Derivatives and its O-Alkyl Esters by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry with Various Ionization Methods and a Flameless Thermionic Ionization Detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, mass spectrometry (MS) and gas chromatography (GC) techniques are the most common methods for nerve agent confirmation. ,, MS methods are the most highly sensitive, with reported detection limits on the order of 10–50 nM (1–4 ng/mL). , While MS and GC methods are powerful and sensitive techniques, they require intricate and time-consuming sample preparation and analyses. The presence of interfering molecules has also been shown to be detrimental to detection limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, mass spectrometry (MS) and gas chromatography (GC) techniques are the most common methods for nerve agent confirmation. ,, MS methods are the most highly sensitive, with reported detection limits on the order of 10–50 nM (1–4 ng/mL). , While MS and GC methods are powerful and sensitive techniques, they require intricate and time-consuming sample preparation and analyses. The presence of interfering molecules has also been shown to be detrimental to detection limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%