1984
DOI: 10.1042/bj2230329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the low-density-lipoprotein receptor from bovine adrenal cortex, rabbit and rat liver and adrenal glands by lipoprotein blotting

Abstract: This paper describes the use of lipoprotein blotting to detect low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) receptors in rat and rabbit liver and adrenal glands and in bovine adrenal glands. Using this technique we show that the rabbit and rat liver LDL receptors have Mr values of 128000 and 145000 respectively. Mr values for the rabbit, rat and bovine adrenal receptors are 131000, 142000 and 132000 respectively. Differences between the bovine adrenal and rat liver receptors are not due to differences in the degree of sialyl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result was similar to that o f previous ly reported LDL receptors in terms of human fibroblasts or bovine adrenal LDL receptors [17,24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result was similar to that o f previous ly reported LDL receptors in terms of human fibroblasts or bovine adrenal LDL receptors [17,24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…3). which coincided with that previously reported for LDL receptors in human liver and bovine adrenal LDL re ceptors [17,24],…”
Section: Inwnmoblotting Analysis O F Mesangia! Cellssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Apart from a possible increase in the rate of secretion of apoB by livers from cholesterol-fed rabbits, two other factors may contribute to this modest increase in accumulation of VLDL total protein: (i) more VLDL is expected to accumulate in perfusates from cholesterol-fed rabbits, even if the rates of secretion of VLDL were the same, because very few of the secreted lipoproteins would be taken up by the suppressed hepatic LDL receptors in cholesterol-fed rabbits (20,36) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as a general rule, the rate of transfer is dependent upon the apparent molecular weight of the protein, and higher molecular weight polypeptides leave the gel slower than lower molecular weight proteins and necessitate a longer blotting time [13]. As demonstrated in several studies using SDS-PAGE [3, 4, 7-11, 14, 151, the LDL receptor is present as a single protein band with an apparent Mr ranging from approximately 130000 to 160000 depending on the animal species [14] or tissue [8], and on the electrophoresis conditions [ 151. Due to the high molecular weight, the LDL receptor transfer to nitrocellulose requires long blotting times (about 16 h), since accelerating voltages are not recommended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The solubilized LDL receptor is able to retain its binding capacity [6] in spite of the denaturing conditions of electrophoresis and the electrophoretic transfer to nitrocellulose [7]. In this way, LDL bound to blotted receptors can be detected directly with high sensitivity by autoradiography [8] or the streptavidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex [9] after incubation with '251-labeled LDL or biotin-modified LDL. LDL receptors also can be detected by incubation of the blotted protein with radiolabeled antibodies like Ig G-C7 [lo], IgG-MAC 188 [ll], IgG-15C8, IgG-HL1, or IgG-4A4 [12], which bind with high affinity and specificity to the LDL-receptor protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%