Applied Microbiology
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-46888-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of Different Bacterial Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study tested E. coli K12 inactivation with the combined effect of high‐pressure homogenization and Nisin in juice, and no significant differences ( p > .05) were found between the treatments with and without Nisin (Pathanibul et al, 2009). It has been found that gram‐negative bacteria are generally more susceptible to damage by mechanical stress, such as sonication, as compared to gram‐positive bacteria (Shiu et al, 2002). Thus, it is believed that the significant interaction obtained is due to the higher susceptibility to damage of gram‐negative bacteria to sonication rather than the presence of Nisin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study tested E. coli K12 inactivation with the combined effect of high‐pressure homogenization and Nisin in juice, and no significant differences ( p > .05) were found between the treatments with and without Nisin (Pathanibul et al, 2009). It has been found that gram‐negative bacteria are generally more susceptible to damage by mechanical stress, such as sonication, as compared to gram‐positive bacteria (Shiu et al, 2002). Thus, it is believed that the significant interaction obtained is due to the higher susceptibility to damage of gram‐negative bacteria to sonication rather than the presence of Nisin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell walls of Gram-negative bacteria are weaker than those of Gram-positive bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria are more susceptible to disintegration by mechanical stress [17], though Gram-negative bacteria are more resistant to antibiotics because of the outer membrane, which contributes to the reduced cell permeability [18]. It is possible that the rinsing step at 80˚C is more detrimental to Gramnegative bacteria compared to Gram-positive bacteria.…”
Section: Classification Of the Isolated Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small size of prokaryotes, in comparison with larger eukaryotic cells, was a considerable obstacle in the development of methods for directly measuring their mechanical properties [47], solved largely by FS methods now routinely used. Cellular mechanical strength mainly relies on the outermost layers, such as the cell wall, envelope, or membrane, in addition to internal structural components such as the cytoskeleton.…”
Section: Viscoelastic Cellular Components and Super Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus lipopolysaccharides, peptidoglycan thickness, the bound form of the peptidoglycanlipoprotein complex and stabilizing cations all play an important role in maintaining viscoelasticity [19]. A micromanipulation study using optical fiber probes to test bursting strength also showed E. coli to have a weaker envelope than the Gram-positive Staphylococcus epidermis, more susceptible to mechanical stress [47]. Researchers thus attribute the elastic component of the cell envelope to the peptidoglycan layer and the viscous component to the liquid phase of the membranes [19,45].…”
Section: Cell Envelopes Walls and Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%