2015
DOI: 10.5194/hessd-12-10197-2015
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the modern Lie scaling method to classical scaling techniques

Abstract: Abstract. In the past two decades a new modern scaling technique has emerged from the highly developed theory on the Lie group of transformations. This new method has been applied by engineers to several problems in hydrology and hydraulics including but not limited to groundwater dynamics, sediment transport, and open channel hydraulics. This study attempts to clarify the relationship this new technology has with the classical scaling method based on dimensional analysis, non dimensionalization, and the Bucki… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the Lie group transformations can be used to find the scaling laws of the variables that can guarantee selfsimilarity of a phenomenon. The advantage of this approach is that it gives a complete picture of the requirements that must be satisfied for self-similarity, in contrast with a classical dimensional analysis, based on Buckingham π theorem, which is only applied to the dynamics in the interior of the domain and not to the boundary conditions [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the Lie group transformations can be used to find the scaling laws of the variables that can guarantee selfsimilarity of a phenomenon. The advantage of this approach is that it gives a complete picture of the requirements that must be satisfied for self-similarity, in contrast with a classical dimensional analysis, based on Buckingham π theorem, which is only applied to the dynamics in the interior of the domain and not to the boundary conditions [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%