1990
DOI: 10.1109/10.43620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the noise sensitivity of nine QRS detection algorithms

Abstract: The noise sensitivities for nine different QRS detection algorithms were measured for a normal, single-channel lead II, synthesized ECG corrupted with five different types of synthesized noise. The noise types were electromyographic interference, 60 Hz powerline interference, baseline drift due to respiration, abrupt baseline shift, and a composite noise constructed from all of the other noise types. The percentage of QRS complexes detected, the number of false positives, and the detection delay were measured.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
398
0
28

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 917 publications
(451 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
398
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…The acquired pulse signal was used to derive the instantaneous heart rate. 12 Instantaneous heart rate is the cyclic fluctuation in the time delay between each heart beat (heart rate increases slightly during inspiration and reduces during expiration), whereas pulse rate is simply the number of heart beats per minute. Three simultaneous recordings of pulse signals and ocular surface topography data were collected for each of the subjects.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquired pulse signal was used to derive the instantaneous heart rate. 12 Instantaneous heart rate is the cyclic fluctuation in the time delay between each heart beat (heart rate increases slightly during inspiration and reduces during expiration), whereas pulse rate is simply the number of heart beats per minute. Three simultaneous recordings of pulse signals and ocular surface topography data were collected for each of the subjects.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sources were characterised by Clifford (2006) and Friesen et al (1990) for contact ECG data. These authors have characterised these noise sources effects on data exploitation.…”
Section: Signal Processing 221 Noise Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 All recordings were visually checked and R-wave triggering was manually corrected if necessary by one of the authors (B. F.). All NN intervals during the 5-min recording period were accepted for computing ventricular heart rate variability.…”
Section: Analysis Of Heart Rate Variability During Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%