2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Recruitment Success of Introduced and Native Species Under Natural Conditions

Abstract: It is commonly accepted that introduced species have recruitment advantages over native species. However, this idea has not been widely tested, and those studies that have compared survival of introduced and native species have produced mixed results. We compiled data from the literature on survival through germination (seed to seedling survival), early seedling survival (survival through one week from seedling emergence) and survival to adulthood (survival from germination to first reproduction) under natural… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…). These investigations documented widespread local adaptation in introduced species that surprisingly matches local adaptations of native species (Flores‐Moreno & Moles ; Oduor, Leimu & van Kleunen ) and materializes within a few generations (Williams, Kendall & Levine ). These rapid adaptations do not involve morphological features but more often physiological or chemical changes in response to climate, competitors, mutualists or natural enemies (Faillace & Morin ; Kilkenny & Galloway ; Colautti et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). These investigations documented widespread local adaptation in introduced species that surprisingly matches local adaptations of native species (Flores‐Moreno & Moles ; Oduor, Leimu & van Kleunen ) and materializes within a few generations (Williams, Kendall & Levine ). These rapid adaptations do not involve morphological features but more often physiological or chemical changes in response to climate, competitors, mutualists or natural enemies (Faillace & Morin ; Kilkenny & Galloway ; Colautti et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Pre-adaptation, phenotypic plasticity and rapid adaptation to novel growing locations for introduced plant species has received enormous attention by scientists in an attempt to explain their success (Sakai et al 2001;Richards et al 2006;Colautti & Barrett 2013;Dlugosch et al 2015). These investigations documented widespread local adaptation in introduced species that surprisingly matches local adaptations of native species (Flores-Moreno & Moles 2013;Oduor, Leimu & van Kleunen 2016) and materializes within a few generations (Williams, Kendall & Levine 2016). These rapid adaptations do not involve morphological features but more often physiological or chemical changes in response to climate, competitors, mutualists or natural enemies (Faillace & Morin 2016;Kilkenny & Galloway 2016;Colautti et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, traits influencing regeneration processes (i.e. dispersal/colonization, resprouting, germination, emergence) also have significant implications for population dynamics and community composition (Zeiter, Stampfli & Newbery, 2006;Donohue et al, 2010;Aicher, Larios & Suding, 2011;Flores-Moreno & Moles, 2013;Pakeman & Eastwood, 2013), but are not well represented in trait-based theoretical frameworks.…”
Section: (A) Response Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results support the “join the locals” hypothesis, suggesting that across a gradient of canopy cover in forests of the upper Midwest, non‐native plants are successful because they share traits similar to those of resident plants and are therefore able thrive under local environmental conditions (Tecco et al., ). This also provides support to the idea that not all successful invaders are “super plants”—some may be successful simply by following the same strategies as successful native species (Flores‐Moreno & Moles, ). However, while non‐native plant traits fall within the range of native plants present in this system, there is some suggestion that they may possess traits toward the more acquisitive end of this range (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%