A comparison of the shear strength of chemically versus electrolytically etched metal retainers

Doukoudakis, Asterios; E, Tzortzopoulou; Gray, S. Lauren

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(92)90157-6

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

1992

DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90157-6

|View full text |Cite

A comparison of the shear strength of chemically versus electrolytically etched metal retainers

Asterios Doukoudakis

Tzortzopoulou E

S. Lauren Gray

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1994

2013

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Traditionally, base metal alloys in solid frameworks with surface treatments that run the gamut from etching to sandblasting or airborne particle abrasion have been used for RBFPDs 6–9. Contradictory results have been reported when resin cement is bonded to base metal alloys exposed to these different surface treatments 6–9…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin‐bonded prostheses

Petrie

Eick

Williams

et al. 2001

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin‐bonded prostheses

Petrie

Eick

Williams

et al. 2001

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5 Traditionally, base metal alloys in solid frameworks with surface treatments that run the gamut from etching to sandblasting or airborne particle abrasion have been used for RBFPDs. [6][7][8][9] Contradictory results have been reported when resin cement is bonded to base metal alloys exposed to these different surface treatments. [6][7][8][9] Although base metal alloys are generally used for RBFPDs, high noble and noble alloys offer excellent castibility and workability after casting, and are biocompatible.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin-bonded prostheses

Petrie¹,

Eick²,

Williams³

et al. 2001

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The most frequent cause of clinical failure of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures is a debonding at the metal-cement interface. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of 3 different alloy-surface treatments when cemented to human enamel with a resin cement.Materials and Methods: Cylinders of a nickel-chromium-beryllium (Ni-Cr-Be) and a gold-palladium (Au-Pd) alloy were fabricated and assigned to different surface treatment groups as follows: Group 1: Ni-Cr-Be, chemically etched; Group 2: Au-Pd, airborne particle-abraded and tin-plated; and Group 3: Au-Pd, airborne particle-abraded and treated with the Alloy Primer (Kuraray Co, LTD, Osaka, Japan). The cylinders were bonded to the enamel surfaces of extracted, human third molars and stored in normal saline at 37°C for 48 hours. The tensile bond strength of 21 specimens from each group was measured on a Universal Testing Machine (Instron, Canton, MA). Three failed specimens of each group were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy.Results: Statistically significant differences (p < .05) were found between all 3 treatment groups. The mean tensile bond strengths (؎ the standard error of mean) recorded as follows: Group 1: 10.6 MPa (؎1.3), Group 2: 0.9 MPa (؎0.2), and Group 3: 13.4 MPa (؎1.0). Specimens from groups 1 and 3 revealed a trend towards mixture of cohesive, within the resin cement, and adhesive failures at the metal-cement interface. Group 2 specimens exhibited primarily adhesive failures at the metal-cement interface.Conclusions: The tensile bond strength of Au-Pd alloy specimens was significantly increased with the Alloy Primer.

show abstract

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin Bonded to Alloy Treated With Sandblasting and Electrolytic Etching

Goswami¹,

Gupta

Sandhu

2013

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conservation of natural tooth structure precipitated the emergence of resin-retained fixed partial dentures. The weakest link in this modality is the bond between resin cement and alloy of the retainer. Various alloy surface treatment have been recommended to improve alloy-resin bond. This in vitro study was carried out to observe changes in the Nickel-Chromium alloy (Wiron 99, Bego) surface following sandblasting or electrolytic etching treatment by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and to evaluate the shear bond strength of a resin luting cement bonded to the surface treated alloy. 80 alloy blocks were cast and divided into four groups of 20 each. In groups-A & B, the test surfaces were treated by sandblasting with 50 and 250 μm sized aluminium oxide particles respectively. In groups-C & D, the test surfaces were first treated by sandblasting with 50 and 250 μm sized aluminium oxide particles respectively followed by electrolytic etching. Test surfaces were observed under SEM at 1,000× magnification. Two alloy blocks of each group were luted together by a resin luting cement (Rely X, 3M) and their shear bond strength was tested. The mean shear bond strength in MPa of groups-A to D were 6.44 (±0.74), 8.18 (±0.51), 14.45 (±0.59) and 17.43 (±1.20) respectively. Group-D showed bond strength that is more than clinically acceptable bond strength. It is recommended that before luting resin-retained fixed partial dentures, the fitting surface of the retainer should be electrolytically etched to achieve adequate micromechanical retention.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

A comparison of the shear strength of chemically versus electrolytically etched metal retainers

Cited by 4 publications

References 6 publications

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin‐bonded prostheses

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin‐bonded prostheses

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin-bonded prostheses

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin Bonded to Alloy Treated With Sandblasting and Electrolytic Etching

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About