2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the validity of the Demirjian, Willems, Nolla and Häävikko methods in determination of chronological age of 5–15 year-old Indian children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
38
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the Willems method, we also find overestimation in Bangladeshi and British [33] and in Indians [2]. However, the study carried out by Mohammed RB et al [34] also in the Indian population reports underestimation with the Willems method.…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 44%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of the Willems method, we also find overestimation in Bangladeshi and British [33] and in Indians [2]. However, the study carried out by Mohammed RB et al [34] also in the Indian population reports underestimation with the Willems method.…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 44%
“…In the case of the Nolla method, we also find underestimation when applied in Brazilians and Croats [30], in Malaysians [31], in Turks [32], in Bangladeshi and British [33] or in Indians [2]. However, there are conflicting results in some of the aforementioned populations, with overestimation being found in the study of Lopes LJ et al [3] with Brazilians and in the study of Mohammed RB et al [34] in Indians.…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was reported that Willems method had greater accuracy in estimating chronological age than Demirjian's method in both groups. Hegde et al (17) tested applicability of four different age estimation methods in Indian children. It was reported that age estimated with Willems method was the most accurate followed by Demirjian's method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%