2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three different residence time distribution modelling methodologies for horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the main flow is at the bottom. Bonner et al (2016) and Liu et al (2018) came to a similar conclusion from their results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This means that the main flow is at the bottom. Bonner et al (2016) and Liu et al (2018) came to a similar conclusion from their results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Richter et al (2003) measured HSFCW and were the first in the literature who found that the actual HRT could be higher than the theoretical HRT; however, they didn't find the reason for this phenomenon. Bonner et al (2017) completed a tracer test on laboratoryscale HSFCWs with red fluorescent dye used as tracer. There were 13 sampling points in the CW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonner et al ( 2017 ) completed a tracer test on laboratory-scale HSFCWs with red fluorescent dye used as tracer. There were 13 sampling points in the CW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the water path can be very complex due to particle size distribution and uniformities of the granular media packing, the development of biofilms and, particularly, the spread of the plants' roots. As a result, the water flow is usually modeled empirically using tracer experiments [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%