1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01055772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three microbial assay procedures for measuring toxicity of chemical residues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microtox and D. magna EC50 data reported in the literature [2,[18][19][20][21] are also presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Determination Of Ec50 Ic50 and Reproductibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microtox and D. magna EC50 data reported in the literature [2,[18][19][20][21] are also presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Determination Of Ec50 Ic50 and Reproductibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Based on inhibition of bioluminescence (Chang et al, 1981;Qureshi et al, 1982; dBased on lethality (LeBlanc, 1980;Qureshi et al, 1982;McFeters et al, 1983). Plotkin and Ram, 1984;Greene et al, 1985). Bitton et al, unpublished. limited permeability of wild-type E .…”
Section: Comparison Of Enzyme Biosynthesis To Other Toxicity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dutka et al (1983) obtained a Microtox 15-min EC50 value of 3.8 mg Cu/L, with toxicity increasing with increasing exposure time. Using 30 tests with Microtox and copper, Greene et al (1985) reported an average EC50 value of 1.2 mg Cu/L, 30-fold greater than the EC50 concentrations of the protozoan chemoattraction assay. Table IV shows comparisons of results using T .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%