1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00245-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three techniques to date stand-replacing fires in lodgepole pine forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods largely rely upon the establishment dates of tree cohorts that regenerate following stand-replacing fire events to date the fire and determine aerial extent of the stand-replacing patches. Thus, in the spruce-dominated forest type we used age structure sampling methods to reconstruct the age of the dominant, presumably oldest trees, thereby estimating the time since the last fire (Kipfmueller and Baker, 1998). Satellite imagery, aerial photography, and field observations were used to identify any potential post-fire forest patches.…”
Section: Tree-ring Fire History Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods largely rely upon the establishment dates of tree cohorts that regenerate following stand-replacing fire events to date the fire and determine aerial extent of the stand-replacing patches. Thus, in the spruce-dominated forest type we used age structure sampling methods to reconstruct the age of the dominant, presumably oldest trees, thereby estimating the time since the last fire (Kipfmueller and Baker, 1998). Satellite imagery, aerial photography, and field observations were used to identify any potential post-fire forest patches.…”
Section: Tree-ring Fire History Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree-ring sampling.-We used dendrochronology to determine the precise time since the beetle outbreak (TSB) and time since a stand-replacing fire, and to reconstruct stand conditions at time of outbreak in all chronosequence stands (Appendix B). In each undisturbed, red-, and gray-stage stand, an increment core was taken at 30 cm from the ground on 10 dominant live trees (Kipfmueller and Baker 1998), whereas in the 25-to 35-year post-outbreak stands, increment cores were sampled on 50 live trees and cross-sections were sampled on 20 downed trees showing MPB galleries. Tree cores were mounted on wood sticks, and all cores and cross-sections were finely sanded (400 grit), scanned (1200 dpi ) and measured with a tree-ring measuring software (OSM 3, SCIEM, Brunn am Gebirge, Austria).…”
Section: Chronosequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is most likely achieved by sampling old trees. An approach to identify old trees and possible survivors of a stand-replacing disturbance is to focus on large-diameter trees (Kipfmueller and Baker 1998). Although, the largest-diameter trees are not necessarily the oldest trees in a stand (Cherubini et al 1998), it is the best feasible approach.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%