2012
DOI: 10.1179/096034012x13493686385559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of three weld consumables for P92 under creep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to lack of available experimental data in the literature for creep crack incubation times for 0.1mm of growth, the comparison [2,43] was made for only 0.2mm. It is noteworthy that creep crack incubation time reduced when larger loads were applied which for both the un-aged and aged consistent with previously represented data [2,43]. However, as shown for the 0.2mm incubation in Fig.…”
Section: 3creep Crack Incubationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to lack of available experimental data in the literature for creep crack incubation times for 0.1mm of growth, the comparison [2,43] was made for only 0.2mm. It is noteworthy that creep crack incubation time reduced when larger loads were applied which for both the un-aged and aged consistent with previously represented data [2,43]. However, as shown for the 0.2mm incubation in Fig.…”
Section: 3creep Crack Incubationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the Monkman-Grant constant and is material property, normally equal to unity. It can be argued that the mechanism of creep deformation and fracture are essentially the same at that specific test condition, if the material obeys this relationship [43]. By plotting minimum creep strain rate against the rupture time for both un-aged and aged P92 steel, Monkman-Grant parameters can be derived, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Monkman-grant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%