2017
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w7-285-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Tree Segmentation Methods Using Very High Density Airborne Laser Scanner Data

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Developments of LiDAR technology are decreasing the unit cost per single point (e.g. single-photo counting). This brings to the possibility of future LiDAR datasets having very dense point clouds. In this work, we process a very dense point cloud (~200 points per square meter), using three different methods for segmenting single trees and extracting tree positions and other metrics of interest in forestry, such as tree height distribution and canopy area distribution. The three algorithms are tested a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied the self-adaptive approach called AMS3D, which calibrates kernel bandwidth as a function of local tree allometric models [25]. Before applying this algorithm, we reduced the initial high density of our SfM point clouds (198 points m −2 ) to the density (58 points m −2 ) in order to increase the speed and quality of the clustering process [57]. Our adapted approach resulted in an overall moderate accuracy of tree detection (60%); however, the number of detected crowns at the plot-level was similar to ground stem counts, with a mean difference of less than 7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the self-adaptive approach called AMS3D, which calibrates kernel bandwidth as a function of local tree allometric models [25]. Before applying this algorithm, we reduced the initial high density of our SfM point clouds (198 points m −2 ) to the density (58 points m −2 ) in order to increase the speed and quality of the clustering process [57]. Our adapted approach resulted in an overall moderate accuracy of tree detection (60%); however, the number of detected crowns at the plot-level was similar to ground stem counts, with a mean difference of less than 7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, 3D ITD methods have been recently studied using information in LiDAR as much as possible (Kandare, Ørka, Chan, & Dalponte, 2016). However, the 3D ITD methods required more complex algorithms to implement, and also processing time could be a new parameter to consider (Pirotti, Kobal, & Roussel, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LidR is a module also dedicated to lidar forestry applications [61,62]. Latest version to the time of writing (2.1) provides methods for reading LAS and LAZ formats, for ground classification, tree segmentation and extraction of descriptive metrics for further analyses.…”
Section: R-cran Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%