2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Two Limited Open Techniques for Carpal Tunnel Release

Abstract: Review of the literature shows the effectiveness of limited open carpal tunnel release to be comparable to that of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in respect of recovery of grip strength, time of return to work and complication rate. A randomised, controlled study was designed to compare the effectiveness of a single versus a double limited open technique of carpal tunnel release. Sixty-five patients (73 hands) with a mean age of 48 years were operated on, 40 hands by the single incision and 33 by the double … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…During moderate to severe stages, surgical treatment is indicated. This can be performed either in the conventional way or endoscopically [20,21]. In both procedures the median nerve is decompressed through the opening of the flexor retinaculum.…”
Section: The Carpal Tunnel Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During moderate to severe stages, surgical treatment is indicated. This can be performed either in the conventional way or endoscopically [20,21]. In both procedures the median nerve is decompressed through the opening of the flexor retinaculum.…”
Section: The Carpal Tunnel Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages and disadvantages of the above techniques are a matter of debate, but their common goal is to release the median nerve by completely transecting the flexor retinaculum (FR) [5][6][7][8][9][10] . Whatever the technique, important structures such as the palmar cutaneous, recurrent motor and digital branches of the median nerve and the ulnar nerve, the superficial palmar arch and tendons must be protected during the operation 9 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6 Other surgeons advocate mini-open incisions. 7,8 We present our early experience using the MANOS device (Thayer Intellectual Property, Inc., San Francisco, CA) for minimally invasive CTR. Nerve stimulation and an awake patient are the basis for avoiding nerve and tendon injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%