A comparison of two methods for the evaluation of prominent discrete tones: Phase 3

Balant, A. C.; Hellweg, Robert D.; Nobile, Matthew A.

doi:10.1121/1.4743122

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In their study, human noise annoyance was evaluated without performing any tasks and a regression model was introduced that included the tonality and loudness metrics while having a good match with annoyance responses for those exposed to noise tones [14]. Balant and Hellweg showed that both the prominence ratio and the tone to noise ratio matched well with perceived annoyance of tone at 250 and 1000 Hz [15]. Ryherd and Wang showed an increasing trend in annoyance and distraction for higher tone levels but did not show significant differences between task performance and noise conditions.…”

Section: Effects Of Noise On Annoyance and Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of noise on mental performance and annoyance considering task difficulty level and tone components of noise

Jafari

Sadeghian

Khavanin

et al. 2019

J Environ Health Sci Engineer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rotating components in mechanical systems produce tonal noises and the presence of these tones effect the quality and comfort of occupants leading to annoyance and a decrease in mental performance. The ISO 1996-2 and ANSI S1.13 standards have described metrics to quantify the effects of prominent tones, but more research on how noise attributes effect annoyance and performance, especially in different levels of task difficulty are necessary. This paper investigates relations between noise metrics, annoyance responses and mental performance under different task difficulty levels while exposed to background noise with tonal components. In this study, sixty participants were evaluated on subjective perceived annoyance and varying workloads while exposed to 18 noise signals with three different prominence tones at three frequency tones and two background noise levels while doing three different levels of n-back tasks in a controlled test chamber. Performance parameters were measured by recording the reaction time, the correct rate, and the number of misses. The results indicate an increasing trend for number of misses and reaction times at higher task difficulty levels, but a decrease for correct rate. The study results showed a significant difference for subjective responses except for annoyance and loudness under different levels of task difficulty. The participants were more annoyed with higher background noise levels, lower tone frequencies and increasing tone levels especially under increasing task difficulty. Loudness metrics highly correlate with other noise metrics. Three models for the prediction of perceived annoyance are presented based on the most strongly correlated noise metrics using neural network models. Each of the three models had different input parameters and different network structures. The accuracy and MSE of all three neural network models show it to be appropriate for predicting perceived annoyance. The results show the effect of tonal noise on annoyance and mental performance especially in different levels of task difficulty. The results also suggest that neural network models have high accuracy and efficiency, and can be used to predict noise annoyance. Model 1 is preferred in certain aspects, such as lower input parameters, making it more user-friendly. The best neural network model included both loudness metrics and tonality metrics. It seems that combined metrics have the least importance and are unnecessary in the proposed neural network model.

show abstract

Section: Effects Of Noise On Annoyance and Performancementioning

confidence: 99%