2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000261556.84266.0f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Two Short Education Programs for Improving Low Back Pain-Related Disability in the Elderly

Abstract: In institutionalized elderly, the handing out of the Back Book supported by a 20-minute group talk improves disability 6 months later, and is even more effective in those subjects with LBP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
71
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…32 Results from randomized controlled trials and small prospective studies are inconsistent. 2,4,7,12,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Differences in sample size, recruitment context (e.g., patients treated in routine practice vs. secondary analyses of data gathered in clinical trials), patients' characteristics, and statistical methods used across studies (e.g., use of hierarchical vs. non-hierarchical models) can account for this inconsistency. For instance, the use of hierarchical models implies pre-hoc assumptions and favors those variables which the authors choose to enter first, since these have a greater chance of attaining statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…32 Results from randomized controlled trials and small prospective studies are inconsistent. 2,4,7,12,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Differences in sample size, recruitment context (e.g., patients treated in routine practice vs. secondary analyses of data gathered in clinical trials), patients' characteristics, and statistical methods used across studies (e.g., use of hierarchical vs. non-hierarchical models) can account for this inconsistency. For instance, the use of hierarchical models implies pre-hoc assumptions and favors those variables which the authors choose to enter first, since these have a greater chance of attaining statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4]7,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][53][54][55][56] , to date no psychological variable has shown to be relevant with regards to the treatment or clinical evolution of LBP patients in the Spanish context. [11][12][13]18 Therefore, further studies should assess the generalizability of current results to other cultural environments, and identify which psychological variables influence the prognosis of LBP in the Spanish cultural context. Those studies should be longitudinal, include large representative samples of acute and chronic patients recruited in clinical practice and use non-hierarchical models, in order to be comparable with the current one and to lead to results which are potentially relevant to clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kovacs et al (2007) realizaram estudo com idosos institucionalizados (n = 661) e idade média de 81,2 anos com e sem DL. Os idosos foram randomizados em 3 grupos educacionais, todos receberam uma palestra resumo de 20 minutos, sendo o G1 grupo de educação ativa mais um livro de coluna; o G2 grupo de higiene postural mais um guia de coluna e o G3 grupo controle (folheto cardiovascular).…”
Section: Tabelaunclassified
“…Porém, poucos autores investigaram seus efeitos na DL crônica da população idosa (Haas et al, 2005;Kovacs et al, 2007), encontrando resultados positivos e significativos apenas na incapacidade funcional relacionada à Programa educacional de autocuidado de coluna | 55 DL dentre as várias variáveis estudadas como: intensidade de dor, saúde geral, qualidade de vida, entre outras.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified