2014
DOI: 10.2478/s13545-014-0124-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of various indices based on benthic macrofauna for the assessment of the ecological status of selected Carpathian streams

Abstract: The biological indices MMI-PL, BMWP-PL, and %EPT were applied to compare the ecological status of Carpathian flysch stream sectors situated above and below sewage treatment plants. MMI-PL was found to be the most sensitive, whereas BMWP-PL indicated a very good ecological status at all sampling stations despite an increased trophic level of water in polluted sectors. %EPT proved to be an unreliable index because of its strong fluctuations resulting mainly from unstable densities of benthic invertebrate groups … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of these indicators correlate with the intensity of particular types of environmental degradation: organic pollution, hydromorphological disturbance, toxicity and general environmental degradation (Bis & Fig. 1 Map of Poland with river network marked and sampling sites classified into three groups differed in terms of abiotic and biocoenotic characteristics; black circles-sites of type 5-1, white circles-sites of type 5-2, triangles-sites of type 6 Mikulec, 2013; Galas et al, 2014) in accordance with assumptions presented by Buffagni et al (2005).…”
Section: Sampling Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of these indicators correlate with the intensity of particular types of environmental degradation: organic pollution, hydromorphological disturbance, toxicity and general environmental degradation (Bis & Fig. 1 Map of Poland with river network marked and sampling sites classified into three groups differed in terms of abiotic and biocoenotic characteristics; black circles-sites of type 5-1, white circles-sites of type 5-2, triangles-sites of type 6 Mikulec, 2013; Galas et al, 2014) in accordance with assumptions presented by Buffagni et al (2005).…”
Section: Sampling Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physicochemical parameters of water also showed elevated values of phosphorus, ammonium, BOD (especially in the summer months), and as such classify the water below a II class of chemical status [Galas et al 2014].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of biological methods are currently applied in Europe to evaluate the biological assessment of water quality, most of which are modules based on studies of benthic macroinvertebrates [4,11,[15][16][17]. The Water Framework Directive imposes the necessity for a comprehensive analysis of all available ecological data that characterise rivers in regards to specific structural environmental parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%