2004
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfh006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

97
687
12
20

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,213 publications
(816 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
97
687
12
20
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not anticipate the lower completion rate for men and thus did not oversample men. Nonetheless, the overall response rate for this study is consistent with other online surveys, particularly those without personalized invitations, introductory postcards, or multiple electronic reminders (Kaplowitz et al, 2004;Sax et al, 2003). Future research internet research using the SESII-W/M would be strengthened by incorporating some of these strategies to increase responding and generate a more balanced sample in terms of gender.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We did not anticipate the lower completion rate for men and thus did not oversample men. Nonetheless, the overall response rate for this study is consistent with other online surveys, particularly those without personalized invitations, introductory postcards, or multiple electronic reminders (Kaplowitz et al, 2004;Sax et al, 2003). Future research internet research using the SESII-W/M would be strengthened by incorporating some of these strategies to increase responding and generate a more balanced sample in terms of gender.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The response rate for the current study, 34.75% (1390/4000) is higher than studies using comparable college samples and data collection methods (e.g., Kaplowitz, Hadlock, & Levine, 2004, response rate of 25.4% with an email and reminder postcard; Sax, Gilmartin, & Bryant, 2003, 21.5%). However, the item response rate (surveys returned with all items complete; Sax, Gilmartin, & Bryant) was much lower (12% of total, and 34.6% of responders).…”
Section: Participantscontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the classification accuracy in the Contractile Dysfunction Syndrome (77%) appears to be lower compared to that in the Articular Dysfunction Syndrome (93%). In addition, agreement less than 80% happened in seven vignettes (Vignettes 5,9,10,11,12,14,17) and the same happened in the previous study 8 recruiting Dip.MDT practitioners except Vignettes 10 and 11. Vignette 11 is an example of the Contractile Dysfunction Syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The participation ratio seemed acceptable as the response ratio in internet survey is expected to be about 20% -50%. [11][12][13] This study found that the majority of the Cred.MDT practitioners in Japan did not use MDT most of the time for the management of patients with extremity problems and were not confident to apply MDT to patients with extremity problems. However, the overall accuracy of their MDT classification for extremity problems was high and the inter-examiner agreement of the classification seemed acceptable, which are similar Values are expressed with mean ± SD or Number (%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%