2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00436.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Weight‐Related Behaviors Among High School Students Who Are Homeless and Non‐Homeless

Abstract: More than 4% of public high school students in Massachusetts meet the federal definition of homelessness. These students are at high risk for disordered weight-control behaviors. Policy decisions at the school, state, and federal levels should make a concerted effort to target these students with social services and nutritional interventions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have observed higher levels of child physical and sexual abuse, as well as intimate partner violence (IPV), among LGB individuals relative to heterosexuals (Balsam, Rothblum, & Beauchaine, 2005; Corliss, Cochran, & Mays, 2002; Matthews, Hughes, Johnson, Razzano, & Cassidy, 2002; Tjaden, Thoennes, & Allison, 1999). LGB adolescents are also at elevated risk of experiencing homelessness (Cochran, Stewart, Ginzler, & Cauce, 2002; Fournier et al, 2009; Kruks, 1991; Van Leeuwen et al, 2006) partially due to expulsion following disclosure of their sexual orientation (Kruks, 1991). Homelessness may also result from victimization by caregivers or romantic partners (Cochran et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have observed higher levels of child physical and sexual abuse, as well as intimate partner violence (IPV), among LGB individuals relative to heterosexuals (Balsam, Rothblum, & Beauchaine, 2005; Corliss, Cochran, & Mays, 2002; Matthews, Hughes, Johnson, Razzano, & Cassidy, 2002; Tjaden, Thoennes, & Allison, 1999). LGB adolescents are also at elevated risk of experiencing homelessness (Cochran, Stewart, Ginzler, & Cauce, 2002; Fournier et al, 2009; Kruks, 1991; Van Leeuwen et al, 2006) partially due to expulsion following disclosure of their sexual orientation (Kruks, 1991). Homelessness may also result from victimization by caregivers or romantic partners (Cochran et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At particular risk for homelessness are lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youths (Coker, Austin, Schuster, 2010; Dunne, Prendergast, & Telford, 2002; Gattis, 2009; Institute of Medicine, 2011; Zerger, Strehlow, & Gundlapalli, 2008). Although LGB youths compose only 1.4% – 5.0% of the general youth population (Kann et al, 2011; Narring, Stronski Huwiler, & Michaud, 2003; Savin-Williams & Ream, 2007), LGB youths compose 15% – 36% of homeless youths (Bailey, Camlin, & Ennett, 1998; Fournier et al, 2009; Freeman & Hamilton, 2008; Gangamma, Slesnick, Toviessi, & Serovich, 2008; Leslie, Stein, & Rotheram-Borus, 2002; Moon et al, 2000; Noell & Ochs, 2001; Rew, Whittaker, Taylor-Seehafter, & Smith, 2005; Van Leeuwen et al, 2006; Whitbeck, Chen, Hoyt, Tyler, & Johnson, 2004). Nevertheless, these prevalences also demonstrate that not all LGB youths experience homelessness, suggesting the need to identify the reasons why some LGB youths experience homelessness, especially given the potential long-term consequences of homelessness for the health and well-being of LGB youths (Clatts, Goldsamt, Yi, & Gwadz, 2005; Cochran, Stewart, Ginzier, & Cauce, 2002; Noell & Ochs, 2001; Rosario, Schrimshaw, & Hunter, in press; Whitbeck et al, 2004; see Gattis, 2009 for review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At particular risk for homelessness are lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth (Coker et al 2010; Dunne et al 2002; Gattis 2009; Zerger et al 2008). Studies have found that LGB youth compose 15–36% of homeless youth (Bailey et al 1998; Fournier et al 2009; Freeman and Hamilton 2008; Gangamma et al 2008; Leslie et al 2002; Moon et al 2000; Noell and Ochs 2001; Rew et al 2005; Van Leeuwen et al 2006; Whitbeck et al 2004), although LGB youth compose only 1.3–3.8% of the general youth population (Bontempo and D'Augelli 2002; Narring et al 2003; Remafedi et al 1992; Savin-Williams and Ream 2007). In addition, recent research has found that LGB youth are more likely than heterosexual youth to be runaways or throwaways living on their own, but no more likely to be living as part of a homeless family (Corliss et al, in press).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%