2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-09753-9_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Word Embedding Models for Turkish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method can achieve state-of-the-art performance even without employing language-dependent features for morphologically rich languages such as Turkish and Czech. (Dündar & Alpaydın, 2019) A recent study conducted by (Bayrak et al, 2023) involved a comparison of Turkish word embeddings trained using Word2Vec, FastText, ELMo, and BERT models. These embeddings were input into an LSTM text classification model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can achieve state-of-the-art performance even without employing language-dependent features for morphologically rich languages such as Turkish and Czech. (Dündar & Alpaydın, 2019) A recent study conducted by (Bayrak et al, 2023) involved a comparison of Turkish word embeddings trained using Word2Vec, FastText, ELMo, and BERT models. These embeddings were input into an LSTM text classification model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%