1973
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740240509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry and chemical methods for determining sulphur in plant material

Abstract: A rapid method for determining total S in plants by X-ray fluorescence spectrometric analysis of ground pelletised plant material is compared with chemical methods using titrimetric, flame photometric and turbidimetric methods of sulphate determination. Errors in the chemical methods were caused by incomplete oxidation of organic sulphur and by non-reproducibility of the turbidimetric determination of sulphate. A method incorporating the oxidation of the sample with HN03 and Mg(NO& and titration of the reduced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grain and straw samples from the pot experiments and grain samples from the field experiment were analysed for nitrogen by Kjeldahl digestion with automated colorimetric determination of the ammonia. Sulphur and copper were determined using X-ray fluorescence speetrometry (Bolton et al 1973) on pressed disk samples of the plant material. Some samples were analysed chemically because only small amounts of dry matter were available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain and straw samples from the pot experiments and grain samples from the field experiment were analysed for nitrogen by Kjeldahl digestion with automated colorimetric determination of the ammonia. Sulphur and copper were determined using X-ray fluorescence speetrometry (Bolton et al 1973) on pressed disk samples of the plant material. Some samples were analysed chemically because only small amounts of dry matter were available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some advantages of this technique are that samples are not destroyed, samples do not require digestion, procedures require less manpower (11,20), and results relate well with many other well established mineral element analysis procedures (2,12,15,21). Determinations of S have especially been adapted to XRF procedures because most other methods have required extensive digestion and laborious techniques (9,13,14,20), and different forms of S like sulfate and S-amino acids can be determined (10,13,17,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%