1964
DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400040146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complement fixation technique for the quantitative measurement of antigenic differences between strains of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease

Abstract: The early literature on the specificity of the immunological types of foot-andmouth disease virus included references to minor antigenic differences which occurred between strains of virus of the same type. Such strains were called variants. The value of these observations, however, was limited by the techniques then available for differentiation. Bedson, Maitland & Burbury (1927) applied an in vitro serum neutralization test in their comparison of two strains of virus of Type A. They recorded results which in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specificity of all the virus strains isolated was checked by complementfixation (CF) tests using the microtitre technique described by Casey (1965 The carrier state in foot-and-mouth disease A virus strain isolated from one of the epithelial samples was adapted to guinea-pigs for the production of a specific antiserum and, using cross-complementfixation tests (Davie, 1964), antigenic differences between this strain, the vaccine strain, carrier virus strains and previously known subtype strains were studied.…”
Section: Virus Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specificity of all the virus strains isolated was checked by complementfixation (CF) tests using the microtitre technique described by Casey (1965 The carrier state in foot-and-mouth disease A virus strain isolated from one of the epithelial samples was adapted to guinea-pigs for the production of a specific antiserum and, using cross-complementfixation tests (Davie, 1964), antigenic differences between this strain, the vaccine strain, carrier virus strains and previously known subtype strains were studied.…”
Section: Virus Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cross-complement-fixation tests the outbreak strain was shown to be antigenically similar to strain Rho 5/66 with a complement-fixation product of 0-83 (Davie, 1964) equivalent to an R value of 91 % (Ubertini et al 1964). Rho 5/66 is a standard World Reference Laboratory subtype strain originating from an outbreak in Rhodesia in 1966 and used since as a vaccine strain.…”
Section: Antigenic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the viruses isolated were adapted to guinea-pigs for specific antiserum production and antigenic differences were studied between these viruses and previously known subtype strains by cross-complement-fixation tests, using the method described by Davie (1964) in addition to the microtitre method.…”
Section: Virus Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific guinea-pig antisera were prepared to both those carrier strains, and cross-complement-fixation tests (Davie, 1964) were carried out in tubes with these strains, the outbreak strain and the vaccine strain. Table 4 illustrates the relationship of these virus strains to each other expressed as cross-fixation products.…”
Section: Serologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ra x rb (or r1 x r2). Davie (1964) classified strains of CFP > 0.5-1.0 into the same subtype, while those of CFP < 0 5 were considered to be different.…”
Section: Complement-fixation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%