2012
DOI: 10.2168/lmcs-8(3:10)2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Complete Axiom System for Propositional Interval Temporal Logic with Infinite Time

Abstract: Abstract. Interval Temporal Logic (ITL) is an established temporal formalism for reasoning about time periods. For over 25 years, it has been applied in a number of ways and several ITL variants, axiom systems and tools have been investigated. We solve the longstanding open problem of finding a complete axiom system for basic quantifier-free propositional ITL (PITL) with infinite time for analysing nonterminating computational systems. Our completeness proof uses a reduction to completeness for PITL with finit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generalised segment modalities from Section 10 can be adapted to an algebraic semantics for the interval temporal logic ITL [Mos12,CM16]. We ignore the next-step operator in our considerations, and our semantics is once again loose: it is not generated by a morphism from the ITL syntax.…”
Section: Interval Temporal Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The generalised segment modalities from Section 10 can be adapted to an algebraic semantics for the interval temporal logic ITL [Mos12,CM16]. We ignore the next-step operator in our considerations, and our semantics is once again loose: it is not generated by a morphism from the ITL syntax.…”
Section: Interval Temporal Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this framework, different kinds of segments, with or without point segments and with different kinds of bounds or compositions, can be included in a uniform and modular way by setting up different kinds of partial semigroups or monoids. From that basis, a substantial part of the interval temporal logic ITL [Mos12] can be obtained, using a semigroup construction for stream functions to abstract from the dynamics of state spaces or program stores (Section 11), and by instantiating to a time domain of natural numbers. This semantics extends seamlessly to the duration calculus [ZH04] (Section 12) and one of its variants, the mean value calculus [PR98] (Section 13), by instantiating to a time domain of real numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an in-depth presentation of PITL we refer the reader to [39]; see also [36], [31] and the ITL web pages [27]. The version of PITL used here has the syntax…”
Section: Propositional Interval Temporal Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LTL operator U is also expressible using chop, and quantification. More details about PITL's expressiveness are found in [35], [38], [39].…”
Section: Propositional Interval Temporal Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have devised theories to explain tense and aspect in English (Bennett & Partee 1978;Davidson 2001;Parsons 1990;Prior 1967;Moszkowski 2012). All their ideas are couched in temporal logic, or I should say, in a time model (Konur 2008;Dowty 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%