We define the notions of weak and strong usefulness and investigate the question whether a randomized response scheme can combine two conflicting goals, namely being weakly (or even strongly) useful and, at the same time, providing ε-differential privacy. We prove the following results. First, if a class F cannot be weakly SQ-learned under the uniform distribution, then ε-differential privacy rules out weak usefulness. This extends a result from [6] that was concerned with the class of parities. Second, for a broad variety of classes F that actually can be weakly SQ-learned under the uniform distribution, we design a randomized response scheme that provides ε-differential privacy and strong usefulness.