2021
DOI: 10.3390/nano11061577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Complete In Vitro Toxicological Assessment of the Biological Effects of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles: From Acute Toxicity to Multi-Dose Subchronic Cytotoxicity Study

Abstract: Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are of significant relevance due to their unique properties, which have been exploited for widespread applications. Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2-NPs) are one of most exploited ENM in the industry due to their excellent catalytic and multi-enzyme mimetic properties. Thus, the toxicological effects of these ENMs should be further studied. In this study, the acute and subchronic toxicity of CeO2-NPs were assessed. First, an in vitro multi-dose short-term (24 h) toxicological as… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to better understand the mechanisms of protection of CeO 2 -NPs observed in vivo, we performed experiments in an in vitro model of oxidative stress already used in our previously published paper [ 14 ]. Based on the results found in the literature, demonstrating the efficacy of CeO 2 -NPs at a concentration ranging from about 0.01 mM up to 0.5 mM in vitro, we used a concentration of 0.1 mM, a dose tenfold lower than that used in our in vivo experiment [ 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to better understand the mechanisms of protection of CeO 2 -NPs observed in vivo, we performed experiments in an in vitro model of oxidative stress already used in our previously published paper [ 14 ]. Based on the results found in the literature, demonstrating the efficacy of CeO 2 -NPs at a concentration ranging from about 0.01 mM up to 0.5 mM in vitro, we used a concentration of 0.1 mM, a dose tenfold lower than that used in our in vivo experiment [ 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants favors oxidants and may culminate in so-called “oxidative stress” ( Salvador et al, 2021 ). As a product of oxidative stress reaction, ROS produced by the interaction between nanomaterials and cells has been reported as one of the pivotal causes of cell damage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 However, provided the high frequency of applications in toxicological screening, this cell line represents a wellestablished model for human alveolar epithelium that can be used for cross-study comparisons. 7,23,24,25,26 In turn, the Calu-3 cells is a more obvious choice as a barrier model for the bronchial mucosa due to their excellent barrier maturation and tight junction formation properties. [27][28][29][30] Notably, Calu-3 cells have also been reported previously to form more physiological barrier models of the lung epithelium in comparison to other bronchial epithelial cell lines such as NHBE or NL-20.…”
Section: Discussion and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In turn, inhalation of cerium oxide a prominent industrial process catalyst or other industrial by-products such as ultrafine carbon can result in a reduction of essential cellular and tissue physiological processes in the lung that can lead to strong inflammatory reactions. 6,7 Additionally, unintended inhalation of zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium oxide (TiO2), which are widely applied NPs for UV protection in sunscreens, cosmetic powders, electronics, and paints are known to provoke dermal toxicity, dysregulation of immune cells and potential toxicological effects in lung tissue due to airborne consumption. 8,9 As an alternative to toxicological animal models, in vitro lung barrier systems exhibiting in vivo-like properties are often used to assess the health effects of airborne nanomaterials.…”
Section: Of 17mentioning
confidence: 99%