2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11044-016-9555-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complete strategy for efficient and accurate multibody dynamics of flexible structures with large lap joints considering contact and friction

Abstract: This paper deals with the dynamics of jointed flexible structures in multibody simulations. Joints are areas where the surfaces of substructures come into contact, for example, screwed or bolted joints. Depending on the spatial distribution of the joint, the overall dynamic behavior can be influenced significantly. Therefore, it is essential to consider the nonlinear contact and friction phenomena over the entire joint. In multibody dynamics, flexible bodies are often treated by the use of reduction methods, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When terms including W 1 , W 2 and W 3 can be neglected, the simulation time decreases significantly in cases where models with a high number of flexible bodies and/or when flexible bodies with many modes are considered. Note that the latter becomes more and more relevant because there is a tendency to consider more and more local effects in flexible multibody dynamics (see, for example, [18][19][20][21] and [26]). In order to illustrate the potential, two examples are given.…”
Section: Benefitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When terms including W 1 , W 2 and W 3 can be neglected, the simulation time decreases significantly in cases where models with a high number of flexible bodies and/or when flexible bodies with many modes are considered. Note that the latter becomes more and more relevant because there is a tendency to consider more and more local effects in flexible multibody dynamics (see, for example, [18][19][20][21] and [26]). In order to illustrate the potential, two examples are given.…”
Section: Benefitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31are not identity matrices. Such reduction bases may be obtained by augmenting linear reduction bases with modal derivatives to capture the effect of nonlinearity on the linear modes [173][174][175]. However, this strategy can be computationally expensive and the number of reduction modes yielded might be quite large, and consequently not offer sufficient reduction in DoFs.…”
Section: Nonlinear Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their work, they formulate Trial Vector Derivatives (TVDs) for time domain analysis and use them for test cases where the normal contact, in particular, is accorded predominant importance. A comparison of the efficiency of different contact and friction models has also been presented in [15]. Hughes et al [16] proposed an interface reduction method where they use System-level Characteristic Constraint (SCC) modes and Properly Orthogonal Interface Modal Derivatives (POIMDs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%