2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complete study of bearing stress in single bolt connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study in [7] included angles with leg width from 40 mm to 150 mm, having leg thickness from 3 mm to 16 mm. [8]) that Eurocode formulation of bearing resistance is conservative and relatively complex. The design for block tearing (Eqs.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Design Resistances Given In En 1993-1-8mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study in [7] included angles with leg width from 40 mm to 150 mm, having leg thickness from 3 mm to 16 mm. [8]) that Eurocode formulation of bearing resistance is conservative and relatively complex. The design for block tearing (Eqs.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Design Resistances Given In En 1993-1-8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large majority of angles were in steel grade S235, connected by 1 to 6 bolts, sizes M12 to M30, with varying bolt pitch, edge and end distances. In order to evaluate the test results, the bearing strength function is taken from [8] with slight modification: In this paper the test results [7] are re-evaluated by considering the block tearing strength function and by ignoring the effective net cross-section strength functions given by Eqs. (4), (5)) was a last minute addition to EC3 and was not considered in the statistical evaluation in [7].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Design Resistances Given In En 1993-1-8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find a more accurate expression to describe the relationship between bearing resistance and end distance, experimental results from different researchers [11][12][13] and the background document of Eurocode 3 [14][15][16] were summarized in addition to the test results presented in this paper. Test results of net cross-section failure were not included since they were controlled by net cross-section check.…”
Section: Comparison With Design Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hard contact in normal direction and friction contact in tangential direction were assigned to the contact pairs, with friction coefficient ranging from 0.05 to 0.25 between plates and between bolt shank and plates, respectively. The numerical model was in general adopted from [5].…”
Section: General (Lagrange Models)mentioning
confidence: 99%