2011
DOI: 10.2478/v10178-011-0015-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Complex Current Ratio Device for the Calibration of Current Transformer Test Sets

Abstract: A practical method with high accuracy in generation and application of error values for calibration of current transformer test sets is described. A PC-controlled three-phase power source with a standard wattmeter is used for generating the nominal and error test currents while an electronically compensated current comparator is used to provide summation and subtraction of them, precisely. With this method, any ratio error and phase displacement values could be generated automatically and nominal and test curr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the method described in [26] and [18], which has been mentioned in Section 2, an increment of simulated errors is limited to the discreteness of the PC-controlled three-phase power source, and a step of changing the ratio of turns of the electronically-compensated current comparator corresponds to 0.5 %. The use of a phase-shifting unit allowed the simulation of CT errors of almost any value using the method proposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the method described in [26] and [18], which has been mentioned in Section 2, an increment of simulated errors is limited to the discreteness of the PC-controlled three-phase power source, and a step of changing the ratio of turns of the electronically-compensated current comparator corresponds to 0.5 %. The use of a phase-shifting unit allowed the simulation of CT errors of almost any value using the method proposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create a procedure for verifying the correctness of the readout of the comparison device, the metrologist must analyze the sources of uncertainty of such means [15][16][17]. Several methods for calibrating comparison devices have been developed [18][19][20][21][22][23], and all they have certain features. This chapter proposes methods for characterizing comparators of almost identical alternating currents or voltages to establish the metrological traceability when using such instruments for the calibration of CTs or VTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional calibration methods generally use the electromagnetic CT with an iron core [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, the iron core is easily saturated at high currents, unless a bulky iron core is used which encounters manufacturing difficulty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%