2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complex lead-free (Na, Bi, Ba)(Ti, Fe)O 3 single phase perovskite ceramic with a high energy-density and high discharge-efficiency for solid state capacitor applications

Abstract: We have investigated a series of compositions in the pseudo-ternary lead-free alloy system Na 1/2 Bi 1/2 TiO 3-BaTiO 3-BiFeO 3 with regard to its energy storage density and discharge efficiency. A composition 0.4(Na 0.5 Bi 0.5 TiO 3)-0.225BaTiO 3-0.375BiFeO 3 of this series was identified to give the best energy density and discharge efficiency. While conventional sintering gave energy density of 0.77 J/cm 3 and discharge efficiency of 67%, we achieved a remarkable increase in energy storage density (∼1.4 J/cm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the energy efficiency slightly increases and then nearly remains constant (~65%) with increases in the field. Figure D provides a comparison of the recoverable energy density in representative lead‐free candidate materials in recent years . It can be seen that the ceramics in this study have a relatively high W re value of 1.75 J/cm 3 , which is nearly 2.5 times higher than that of Nb‐modified BiFeO 3 ‐BaTiO 3 ceramics .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Meanwhile, the energy efficiency slightly increases and then nearly remains constant (~65%) with increases in the field. Figure D provides a comparison of the recoverable energy density in representative lead‐free candidate materials in recent years . It can be seen that the ceramics in this study have a relatively high W re value of 1.75 J/cm 3 , which is nearly 2.5 times higher than that of Nb‐modified BiFeO 3 ‐BaTiO 3 ceramics .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To fully illustrate the superior energy storage performances of the 0.85NBT-0.06BT-0.09ASN ceramic, comparison of W rec ~ ƞ between 0.85NBT-0.06BT-0.09ASN ceramic and the above lead-free ceramics is shown in Fig. 8b [12,15,29,43,56,71,[76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87]. It is obvious that the 0.85NBT-0.06BT-0.09ASN ceramic simultaneously exhibits high W rec and ƞ as relative to most of the lead-free energy storage ceramics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Recoverable energy density of selected lead-free relaxor systems from 2010 to 2020 [ 97 , 100 , 103 , 122 , 123 , 141 , 197 , 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 , 210 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 , 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 239 , 240 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 ]. Note: BNT—Bismuth Sodium Titanate, BST—Barium Strontium Titanate and BZT—Barium Zirconium Titanate.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%