2011
DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.14.2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Composite Index of Public Transit Accessibility

Abstract: Measuring ease of access to transit services is important in evaluating existing services, predicting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on their literature review, Mamun et al (2011) chose three methods of measuring accessibility, and then proposed weighting factors for individual method to come up with a composite measure for a case study in Meriden, Connecticut [39].…”
Section: Measuring Composite Transit Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on their literature review, Mamun et al (2011) chose three methods of measuring accessibility, and then proposed weighting factors for individual method to come up with a composite measure for a case study in Meriden, Connecticut [39].…”
Section: Measuring Composite Transit Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bertolaccini and Lownes (2015) also developed an automated method to evaluate the changes in transit accessibility through the day using only GTFS and population data to make it easier to find relevant datasets. Al Mamun and Lownes (2011) reviewed different methods and proposed weighting factors for individual methods to formulate a composite index of public transit accessibility.…”
Section: Accessibility Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies of social equity and public transit accessibility entail an aggregate comparison between transit need and transit supply. In these studies, transit need is often established over space as a measure of socioeconomic status in neighborhood units while transit supply is typically measured at the neighborhood level as the ease of reaching transit facilities (Murray et al, 1998;O'Neill, Ramsey and Chou, 1992;Moniruzzaman and Páez, 2012), reaching transit facilities weighted by level of service (Rood and Sprowls, 1998;Henk and Hubbard, 1996;Ryus et al, 2000;Hunter-Zaworski, 2003;Drew and Rowe, 2010;Al Mamun and Lownes, 2011;Currie, 2010), or reaching actual destinations with transit (O'Sullivan, Morrison and Shearer, 2000;Lei and Church, 2010;Foth, Manaugh and ElGeneidy, 2013;Páez and Farber, 2012;Farber, Morang and Widener, 2014). One drawback of these studies is that transit need is poorly characterized by zonal population characteristics since different population groups demand travel to different types of destinations at different times of the day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public transit accessibility has been extensively studied from the perspectives of station access (Murray et al, 1998;O'Neill, Ramsey and Chou, 1992;Moniruzzaman and Páez, 2012), average service frequency (Rood and Sprowls, 1998;Henk and Hubbard, 1996;Ryus et al, 2000;Hunter-Zaworski, 2003;Drew and Rowe, 2010;Al Mamun and Lownes, 2011) and origindestination travel times (O'Sullivan, Morrison and Shearer, 2000;Lei and Church, 2010). These can all be considered static measures of access, since the score for a particular location does not vary temporally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%