1992
DOI: 10.1038/357207a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compositional classification scheme for meteoritic chondrules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sears et al (1992) and Haak and Scott (1993) first suggested that it was type IA chondrules that were preferentially lost from the OC formation region, but as was pointed out by Grossman (1996), the typically low Na/Si ratios of type IA chondrules compared to CI and bulk OC (Fig. 11) means that the loss of type IAs alone cannot account for the volatile element fractionations.…”
Section: What Was Fractionated From What?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sears et al (1992) and Haak and Scott (1993) first suggested that it was type IA chondrules that were preferentially lost from the OC formation region, but as was pointed out by Grossman (1996), the typically low Na/Si ratios of type IA chondrules compared to CI and bulk OC (Fig. 11) means that the loss of type IAs alone cannot account for the volatile element fractionations.…”
Section: What Was Fractionated From What?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Jones type IIA chondrules and the INAA averages are also very similar to the bulk silicate OC compositions. Sears et al (1992) have argued that type I chondrules are underrepresented in the chondrules studied by INAA. However, as pointed out by Grossman (1996), the significantly smaller sizes and masses of the type I chondrules means that even if they are underrepresented, this will only have a modest effect on the bulk chondrule composition.…”
Section: Major Element Compositions Of Chondrites Chondrules and Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequence of this is that the fields in the ternary discriminant diagram of DeHart et al (1992) and Sears et al (1992) delineating A5, B1, B2, B3 are not justified. There probably are real differences between the chondrules that these authors classified as B1 and those that plot in the other fields: these are the chondrules with mesostasis most susceptible to beam damage, meaning that they are chondrules with less crystalline albite.…”
Section: Classification Of Chondrulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not mean, however, that shock events elsewhere on the parent body could not have generated the heat or fluids associated with metamorphism in these chondrites. DeHart et al (1992) and Sears et al (1992) developed a classification scheme for chondrules based on three properties: CL of major phases, especially olivine and mesostasis, CaO-FeO relationships in olivine, and the normative composition of mesostasis. This scheme divides chondrules into two major groups, A (bright CL) and B (low CL), which are in turn divided into subgroups A1-A5 and B1-B3 on the basis of mineral compositions.…”
Section: The Role Of Shock Metamorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another 5-10 showed uniformly high Na in their mesostasis, but without visible zoning. Among the type II (high-FeO, Sears group B) chondrules, which greatly outnumber type I chondrules (Sears et al, 1992) and which are much richer in alkalis, only a few potentially weakly zoned chondrules were found using the Na maps. Thus, -15% ofSemarkona chondrules are overtly zoned in Na, almost all of which are type I.…”
Section: Abundance Of Zoned Chondrules In Semarkonamentioning
confidence: 99%